We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 76

The Supreme Court rescues Obamacare one more time
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

The United States Supreme Court today issued an opinion in King v. Burwell that upholds the Obama administration’s interpretation of language in the


Sixth Circuit decision emphasizes the importance of expert testimony
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2014

The Sixth Circuit recently reinforced the importance of Reliability in expert testimony by upholding the exclusion of such testimony in a products


U.S. Supreme Court clarifies liability for opinions in registration statements
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

Opinions in registration statements continue to be one of the most commonly litigated items under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Section


Sixth Circuit retiree health care case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a Sixth Circuit retiree health care case, M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett. The issue is: Whether, when


Health reimbursement accounts failed to satisfy collective bargaining agreement provisions: is the Sixth Circuit handcuffing employers?
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2014

We have a new Sixth Circuit decision regarding "vested" retiree health care benefits that is likely to be of concern to many employers, United Steel


Sixth Circuit's enforcement of Specialty Healthcare standard opens door wider for union organizing efforts
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2013

Last month, the Sixth Circuit in Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC v. NLRB enforced the National Labor Relations Board's 2011 Specialty Healthcare II


The Obamacare see-saw an opposing decision on subsidies
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

Just hours after the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Halbig v. Burwell, which held that tax subsidies made available under the


Obamacare takes an unexpected hit!
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

A Federal Court of Appeals panel in Washington, D.C. today released a decision that, if upheld, would strike down one of the main pillars of the


The health care reform shared responsibility excise tax missing link: employer rights
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

Back in 2011, I mentioned a missing link in the Health Care Reform Section 4980H shared responsibility employer excise tax scheme.42 U.S.C. Section


United States v. Windsor: where is my money! Obtaining tax refunds for same-sex spouse benefits
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2013

It is hard to believe that nearly five months have passed since the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in United States v