We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 77

The Obamacare see-saw an opposing decision on subsidies
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

Just hours after the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Halbig v. Burwell, which held that tax subsidies made available under the


Obamacare takes an unexpected hit!
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

A Federal Court of Appeals panel in Washington, D.C. today released a decision that, if upheld, would strike down one of the main pillars of the


The health care reform shared responsibility excise tax missing link: employer rights
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

Back in 2011, I mentioned a missing link in the Health Care Reform Section 4980H shared responsibility employer excise tax scheme.42 U.S.C. Section


The first progeny of the Hobby Lobby decision
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2014

As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores and


Corporations get religion and maybe lose contraception coverage
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 2 2014

The United States Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision issued on Monday that regulations issued under the Affordable Care Act (the "ACA") that compel


A merger for better healthcare...no problem, right? Wrong, says the FTC
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2014

By now, you likely are accustomed to hearing about the federal government challenging the merger of two hospitals or health systems. More often than


Sixth Circuit decision emphasizes the importance of expert testimony
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2014

The Sixth Circuit recently reinforced the importance of Reliability in expert testimony by upholding the exclusion of such testimony in a products


The importance of the state action exemption on state licensing boards
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2014

This podcast discusses the background and potential legal implications, particularly on state licensing boards, of North Carolina Board of Dental


Sixth Circuit delivers big win for drug manufacturers
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2014

In the case In re: Darvocet, Darvon, and Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12111 (6th Cir. June 27, 2014), the United


U.S. Supreme Court clarifies liability for opinions in registration statements
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

Opinions in registration statements continue to be one of the most commonly litigated items under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Section