We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 72

U.S. Supreme Court clarifies liability for opinions in registration statements
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

Opinions in registration statements continue to be one of the most commonly litigated items under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Section


Life sciences patent subject matter eligibility two steps forward, one step back
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2015

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its revised Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 on Dec


The Supreme Court unanimously says changes to retiree medical coverage a matter of contract analysisbut with a mild twist
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 28 2015

In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the "Court") issued an opinion on


Sixth Circuit decision emphasizes the importance of expert testimony
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2014

The Sixth Circuit recently reinforced the importance of Reliability in expert testimony by upholding the exclusion of such testimony in a products


The Obamacare see-saw an opposing decision on subsidies
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

Just hours after the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Halbig v. Burwell, which held that tax subsidies made available under the


Obamacare takes an unexpected hit!
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

A Federal Court of Appeals panel in Washington, D.C. today released a decision that, if upheld, would strike down one of the main pillars of the


The health care reform shared responsibility excise tax missing link: employer rights
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

Back in 2011, I mentioned a missing link in the Health Care Reform Section 4980H shared responsibility employer excise tax scheme.42 U.S.C. Section


The first progeny of the Hobby Lobby decision
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2014

As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores and


Ammunition to rebut “obvious to try”
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2013

The recent Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ltd. v. Rea (Appeal No. 2012-1530, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16610


Sixth Circuit's enforcement of Specialty Healthcare standard opens door wider for union organizing efforts
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2013

Last month, the Sixth Circuit in Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC v. NLRB enforced the National Labor Relations Board's 2011 Specialty Healthcare II