We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 83

The Supreme Court rescues Obamacare one more time
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

The United States Supreme Court today issued an opinion in King v. Burwell that upholds the Obama administration’s interpretation of language in the


The Supreme Court unanimously says changes to retiree medical coverage a matter of contract analysisbut with a mild twist
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 28 2015

In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the "Court") issued an opinion on


Life sciences patent subject matter eligibility two steps forward, one step back
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2015

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its revised Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 on Dec


U.S. Supreme Court clarifies liability for opinions in registration statements
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

Opinions in registration statements continue to be one of the most commonly litigated items under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Section


Ohio federal court holds generic drug manufacturer not liable for inadequate warnings where plaintiff’s physicians did not read and rely on warnings
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • November 17 2015

In the case Fulgenzi v. PLIVA, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144283 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2015), the United States District Court for the Northern


2016 antitrust developments: Foreshadowing 2017?
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 4 2017

It’s that time of year again, when we reflect on what happened during the prior year and prepare for another one. Let’s take a moment to look at some


Briefing continues in Stewart v. Vivian, the certified conflict case concerning Ohio's Apology Statute, R.C. 2317.43
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2017

Briefing is continuing in Stewart v. Vivian, Case No. 2016-1013 in the Supreme Court of Ohio. Stewart is the certified conflict case presently


Supreme Court finds pharmaceutical sales reps exempt under the outside sales exemption
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2012

In a highly anticipated decision under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the United States Supreme Court handed down a big win on Tuesday for the pharmaceutical industry when the Court found pharmaceutical sales representatives are covered by the outside sales exemption in Christopher v. Smith Kline Beecham Corp


2015 is lurking: are your health and welfare and cafeteria plans up-to-date?
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2014

The snow falling outside my window right now is a stark reminder that the end of 2014 is right around the corner. With 2015 approaching, employers


The first progeny of the Hobby Lobby decision
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2014

As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores and