We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 959

NLRB posting rule dealt another blow
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2013

It has been almost a year since there was news to report about the NLRB proposed rule requiring employers to post notices about union organizing


The importance of the state action exemption on state licensing boards
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2014

This podcast discusses the background and potential legal implications, particularly on state licensing boards, of North Carolina Board of Dental


Failure to identify information as confidential or trade secret pursuant to requirements of non-disclosure agreement can preclude recovery for misappropriation under Uniform Trade Secrets Act
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2013

A recent decision from the Federal Circuit illustrates the perils of not following the requirements of a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with respect


NLRB: employer unlawfully fired employee for calling supervisor a “NASTY M____ F____ER”
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2015

On Tuesday, March 31, 2015, the NLRB issued an order upholding an ALJ decision that Pier Sixty LLC violated Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the


U.S. Supreme Court clarifies liability for opinions in registration statements
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

Opinions in registration statements continue to be one of the most commonly litigated items under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Section


Who is “participant” in a nonqualified plan? Second Circuit case highlights importance of defined terms
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2015

One issue that sometimes arises when drafting a nonqualified plan document (or qualified plan for that matter) is how to define a "participant" in


Tax considerations in settlement agreements regarding cancellation of debt
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2015

Although not every settlement agreement has to be reviewed by a tax lawyer if you are representing a creditor or a debtor and the subject matter of


Courts can (barely) weigh in on whether EEOC satisfies its conciliation obligations
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2015

On Wednesday of this week, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously vacated and remanded a 7th Circuit decision that said courts could not review whether


More caution from the NLRB to employers with broad handbook prohibitions
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

Similar to our blog post last week on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel's guidance memorandum on employee handbooks, a NLRB


Ninth Circuit decision illustrates importance of clearly designating beneficiaries under a nonqualified plan
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

In a recent blog, we discussed the importance of clearly defining who is a "participant" in a nonqualified plan and who is a former participant or