We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 838

Gawker update: class notification via social media limited
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2015

In a previous post, we discussed plaintiffs' attempt in the class action lawsuit Mark v. Gawker Media LLC (S.D.N.Y.) to notify potential members of


Coinye West will not take over Bitcoin’s reign on cryptocurrency
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2014

There's exciting news in the world of cryptocurrency, the exchange medium that uses cryptography to secure the transactions and control the creation


Obamacare takes an unexpected hit!
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

A Federal Court of Appeals panel in Washington, D.C. today released a decision that, if upheld, would strike down one of the main pillars of the


The health care reform shared responsibility excise tax missing link: employer rights
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

Back in 2011, I mentioned a missing link in the Health Care Reform Section 4980H shared responsibility employer excise tax scheme.42 U.S.C. Section


The first progeny of the Hobby Lobby decision
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2014

As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores and


Federal judge rejects the proposed settlement for tech companies who allegedly violated antitrust law by agreeing not to solicit each other’s employees
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • August 18 2014

We previously discussed here the antitrust case involving several high-tech companies who allegedly entered into bilateral agreements in which they


The illusion of an available job for the disabled: the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Kennard v. Means Industries, Inc. addresses long-term disability determinations
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 8 2014

A farmer was having a tough time understanding why his chickens were producing less eggs than in previous years. He wrote a letter to the local


ESOP boundaries: plan design versus fiduciary function
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2014

Greeting from Northeast Ohio. We have LeBron James coming home, the Republican National Convention, and something almost as exciting: thoughts about


Don’t play fast and loose with FMLA rights!
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Concluding that the employer's failure to notify a pregnant employee of her FMLA rights and to reinstate her to her former position or any other


Insurance policies do not protect employers from intentional torts in Ohio
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • March 19 2015

In Hoyle v. DTJ Ents., Inc., the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that provisions of an insurance policy do not require an insurance company to indemnify