We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 932

Ohio General Assembly amends statutory attorney-client privilege
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • January 4 2013

Financial institutions' lawyers working in Ohio (and their clients) should take note of an important development regarding the law of attorney-client


SCOTUS defines "supervisor" for Title VII cases as one who can take tangible employment actions
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2013

In Vance v. Ball State University, No. 11-556 (June 24, 2013), the United States Supreme Court held that an employee is a "supervisor" for purposes


A certified question about "wrongful attempted foreclosure" likely to be left unanswered for now
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 24 2013

On May 2, we reported here on a trifecta of noteworthy lending cases that were accepted for review by the Ohio Supreme Court. One of the three cases


Merger of St. Luke’s Health System and Saltzer Medical Group blocked
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

Today, the Ninth Circuit upheld a ruling by an Idaho Federal District Court that ordered St. Luke's Health System Ltd. to divest its acquisition of


Recent litigation provides lessons for employers and executives regarding nonqualified deferred compensation plans
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2013

In the past few years, including 2013, we have seen federal court cases that show both employers and their executives who participate in nonqualified


Employers can learn from recent cases involving the Federal Trade Commission
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • May 9 2014

Two recent decisions - one from the federal district court in New Jersey and one from a federal Administrative Law Judge - potentially will have


Participant document requests under ERISA: throw the crystal balls away! Sixth Circuit adopts “clear notice standard”
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2014

"Can I have all documents related to my retirement plan benefit?" If you are involved with administering an ERISA-governed plan, you have probably


Reminder to federal contractors about NLRA employee rights poster obligations
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

There is some confusion in the employer community about the obligation to post a notice concerning union organizing rights. Most employers do not


Appellate court rules that creditor cannot cog on an accelerated debt
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • June 6 2013

In The Henry County Bank v. Stimmels, Inc., et al., 3rd Dist. No. 7-12-19, 2013-Ohio-1607 (Apr. 22, 2013) the Third Appellate District Court rendered


Key e-discovery cases in February
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • March 21 2014

In February, there again was a number of interesting spoliation decisions, including an order permitting the defendants to assert a counterclaim for