We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 10,815

Seven Canadian Companies Fined $1.28 Million for Unsolicited Telemarketing Campaigns
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2016

Since March 30, 2016, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has issued C$1.28 million in fines to seven Canadian


“Golden Leash” Disclosure
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2016

When an investor has the right to appoint one of its employeespartners to the board of a corporation, and the investor provides a separate


In Re: Aqua Products, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

Aqua Products, Inc. (patent owner) appealed from a written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in an inter partes review (IPR) of a


TLI Communications LLC v. AV Automotive, L.L.C
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

TLI Communications appealed the Eastern District of Virginia’s decision that its patent failed to claim patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C


NARB Recommends Discontinuance of Lysol Comparative Advertising Claims
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recently recommended that Reckitt Benckiser, Inc. discontinue certain advertising for its


Genzyme Therapeutic Products v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

The patentee appealed two inter partes review (IPR) decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), arguing that by relying on facts and legal


Nebraska Breach Law Amendment Effective Today
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

As we previously reported, Nebraska’s breach law was amended earlier this year and the effective date for that amendment is today (July 20, 2016). As


Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

The patentee appealed the district court’s grant of the accused infringer’s motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), finding that the claims


SAS Institute, Inc. v. ComplementSoft, LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

On SAS’s petition for inter partes review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted a review on some but not all of the challenged


Officer’s Fiduciary Duty When Negotiating HisHer Own Compensation Agreements
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

I have blogged frequently on the fiduciary duty of a board of directors or compensation committee when negotiating and setting executive compensation