We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 117

Federal Appellate Court Rules That Post-Acceleration Payment in Bankruptcy Constitutes Optional Redemption
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 6 2016

The linked Mintz Levin client advisory discusses a recent Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that held a "make-whole" optional redemption premium


3 Guidelines to Maximize Value of Data
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 24 2016

Imagine you are the CEO of company sitting across from an interviewer. The interviewer asks you the age old question, “So tell me about your company’s


Can the Corporate Veil be Pierced Against a Former Shareholder?
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 19 2016

A recent opinion issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois reminds us that corporate veil-piercing liability is


Bankruptcy Settlements may not have to Comply with the Absolute Priority Rule? Not so fast
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • June 29 2016

In an earlier blog piece we reported on the Third Circuit's 2015 decision in In re Jevic Holding Corp. where the Court approved a settlement


Three Strikes and Recovery Act is Out
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • Puerto Rico, USA
  • June 13 2016

Today's U.S. Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust puts an end to one of Puerto Rico's


Good News on “Bad Boy” Guarantees - IRS Reverts to Prior Position in Recent Legal Advice Memorandum
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

On April 15, 2016, the IRS released a generic legal advice memorandum (GLAM 2016-001) (the "April GLAM") addressing the impact of so-called "bad boy"


Tranquil waters once again in the safe harbor: Bankruptcy safe harbor protects shareholders from state constructive fraud claims
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • April 13 2016

Shareholders who received nearly $8 billion from the Tribune Company leveraged buyout (LBO) do not have to give back that money as a constructive


Oil, Gas and Mineral Companies Take Note: Agreements Purporting to “Run with the Land” may be Rejected in Bankruptcy
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • April 6 2016

A recent bankruptcy court decision from the influential Southern District of New York permitted a debtor to reject executory contracts with midstream


You Can Lead a Horse to Water, But You Can’t Call it an Airplane: Supreme Court Oral Arguments Suggest Puerto Rico’s Recovery Act May Recover
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • March 23 2016

A few thoughts on Tuesday’s oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the litigation over whether Puerto Rico’s Public Corporations Debt


Statutory Liens vs. Consensual Liens: Why it Matters and When it may Not
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • March 20 2016

While secured creditors are entitled to special rights in bankruptcy, those rights may differ depending on whether creditors have a statutory or