We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,764

"The allergens" requires all allergens not just one or more
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 3 2011

Judge Bucklo construed the claims in this patent infringement case involving a method of neutralizing protein allergens found in natural rubber latex


Confidentiality provision does not prevent production
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 4 2012

Judge St. Eve granted plaintiffcounter-defendant Morningware’s motion to compel production from third party SKE in this patent and Lanham Act suit regarding convection ovens


Trading technologies: settlement and consent judgment
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 7 2011

Judge Kendall entered the parties - Trading Technologies and TradeHelm - agreed consent order, as part of their settlement in this futures trading software - there is much more on this and related cases in the Blog's archives case


California Supreme Court grants review of Berkeley Hillside
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 29 2012

On May 23, 2012, the California Supreme Court unanimously granted review of the First Appellate District’s decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley


Doe defendant allowed to use pseudonym in porn download case to avoid abusive litigation tactics
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 14 2012

Judge Tharp denied Doe defendant’s motion to quash a subpoena seeking his identifying information from his cable provider in this BitTorrent copyright case, but allowed the Doe to proceed in the suit using a pseudonym


Apple v. Motorola: Judge Posner decides multiple patent summary judgment motions
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 4 2012

In light of the upcoming trial of this case in stages beginning with liability on June 11, 2012 and the interest because of both the high profile parties and the fact that Seventh Circuit Judge Posner is presiding over the case, I am going to go out of order and profile a significant number of opinions from this case during June


Hypothetical outcomes cannot be the basis for abstention
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 23 2012

Judge Holderman denied defendants’ motion to stay plaintiffs’ (collectively "USWAY") trademark and copyright case involving its USWAY mark based upon the Colorado-River abstention doctrine


Florida increases criminal penalties for sales of unregistered securities
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 23 2012

Under a new Florida law, beginning July 1, 2012, persons guilty of selling unregistered securities or failing to register as a seller of non-exempt securities will be subject to higher prison sentences, up to a maximum of five years


Case transferred to defendant’s home district
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2012

Judge Holderman granted defendant Grote Industries’ (“Grote”) motion and transferred this patent case involving high-powered LED lights to the Southern District of Indiana


Sanctions motion treated as request to terminate counsel
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2012

Judge Shadur ordered that pro se plaintiff’s counsel be terminated and that counsel respond to plaintiff’s motion for sanctions to the extent it related to him