We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,637

Placement of checkbox can make or break a clickwrap agreement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2015

The enforceability of a wrap agreement (browsewrap, clickwrap and shrinkwrap) can often turn on what to the untrained eye may be mere minutiae. Such


U.S. Supreme Court holds that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the FHA
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

Today, in a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the Fifth Circuit that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair


Fair Housing Act prohibits policies and practices causing a disparate impact
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

On June 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court held that individuals and groups can challenge housing policies or practices that have a disproportionate


Bit Torrent does must overlap in swarm to be joined
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2015

Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-14., No. 15 C 2924, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Apr. 7, 2015) (Shadur, Sen. J.). Judge Shadur sua sponte granted plaintiff


Religious institutions: August 2015
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2015

The decision by the United States Supreme Court on same-sex marriage has been greeted with praise and disdain by different corners of the country


Patent application publication does not trigger statute of limitation at pleadings stage
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 27 2015

Judge Tharp denied Defendant’s (collectively “Curaline”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff Ferris’ Lanham Act and related state law


Another invalidated clickwrap agreement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 14 2015

The foremost case dealing with whether "wrap agreements" (e.g. clickwrap, shrinkwrap and browsewrap) are legal is almost 13 years old. See Specht v


Delay during settlement talks not prejudiced
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2015

Judge Lefkow granted defendant Motio’s motion to amend its answer and counterclaim adding counterclaims and an affirmative defense regarding


Mutual non-compliance with Local Rule 56.1 avoids procedural grant or denial
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2011

Judge Zagel denied plaintiff Healix's motion for summary judgment as to defendant HHI's alleged tortious interference and denied HHI's motion to dismiss Healix's tortious interference claim


Maryland Appellate Court: County stormwater permit violates CWA and state law
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 10 2015

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals (CSA) issued a significant decision in Maryland Department of the Environment, et al. V. Anacostia Riverkeeper