We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,919

Aiding and abetting shareholder oppression?
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • September 8 2015

Earlier this summer, in Brown v. Pennington, No. 05-14-01349-CV, 2015 WL 3958618 (Tex. App., June 30, 2015), the Texas Court of Appeals dismissed a


U.S. Supreme Court holds that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the FHA
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

Today, in a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the Fifth Circuit that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair


Narrow “governing law” clause precludes forum non conveniens motion
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2015

Governing law provisions are seemingly ubiquitous in all contracts, but even so, drafting errors, or an arguable lack of precision, remain prevalent


"Raisin Case" could have broad impact
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the "Raisin Case" (Horne v. Department of Agriculture) has implications far beyond the vines of Fresno. The court


Colorado Supreme Court upholds termination of medical marijuana user
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2015

The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the termination of a quadriplegic Dish Network employee who was a licensed medical marijuana user under Colorado’s


Negotiated Litigation Reserve Not Protected Work Product
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 14 2016

Judge Rowland granted in part defendants’ motion for a protective order preventing production of their Equity Purchase Agreement


Covered business method review of four of fifteen patents warrants stay
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2015

Judge Kendall granted defendants’ motion to stay this patent litigation pending the Patent Office’s (“PTO”) Covered Business Method Review (“CBM”) of


Fair Housing Act prohibits policies and practices causing a disparate impact
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

On June 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court held that individuals and groups can challenge housing policies or practices that have a disproportionate


Food and Beverage Law Update: December 2016
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 6 2016

In State of Nev. V. U.S. Dep't of Labor Case No. 4:16-cv-00731-ALM, 2016 WL 6879615 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2016), a Texas district court enjoined


Trade secrets misappropriation suit over solicitation of employees
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2015

In Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. the California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s award of attorneys’