We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,799

Rule 30(b)(6) witness cannot be instructed not to answer questions about a noticed topic
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 31 2013

Judge Cox granted defendants’ (collectively “Crimson”) motion to compel answers to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition questions and for sanctions in


Illinois Appellate Court narrows Attorney General's FOIA opinion on communications on elected officials' private devices
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2013

On July 16, 2013, the Appellate Court of Illinois for the Fourth District issued an opinion in City of Champaign v. Madigan, 2013 IL App (4th) 120662


Court construes pharmaceutical terms
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 26 2012

Judge St. Eve construed the claims in this patent case related to bivalirudin. Of particular note: “Pharmaceutical Batches” was construed as “may include


Discovery limited to avoid a fishing expedition
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2013

Judge Keys granted in part defendant MBHB’s motion to compel document production and request for admission responses in this copyright case involving


LabMD attempt to overturn FTC decision declared an unripe claim
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2014

As far as disputes between administrative agencies and investigated companies, this one has gotten particularly public and ugly. The dispute in


Patents held unenforceable after bench trial
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2013

Judge Hart entered findings of fact and conclusions of law after a patent bench trial related to cell phones with caller ID, text messaging, pictures or


Supreme Court dismisses California's Proposition 8 same-sex marriage case
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2013

Sidestepping a highly divisive issue, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that it lacked authority to decide on the merits whether an initiative passed


Plaintiff may not communicate with Does in BitTorrent case by email or phone
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 17 2014

Judge Gottschall denied two Doe defendants’ motions to quash subpoenas to their respective ISPs seeking, among other things, their identities based


N.Y. Court of Appeals allows hospitality industry employer broad discretion in mandatory tip pooling
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2013

In decision that is helpful to hospitality industry employers, the New York State Court of Appeals has given restaurants and other food outlets


Recent rulings find preemption of state law claims and enforce airline contracts of carriage
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2013

In the past few months, courts have issued several decisions favorable to the airlines finding preemption of various state law claims and rejecting