We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,059

District court allows discovery to re-open to permit plaintiff to compel defendant to produce update sales records prior to trial
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2015

Isola USA Corp. ("Isola") moved to compel Taiwan Union Technology Corp. ("TUC") to provide updated sales data in response to document requests an


FCC says blocking FCC-approved Wi-Fi hotspots is “patently illegal” and imposes $750,000 fine on Smart City
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2015

On August 18, 2015, the FCC announced a $750,000 civil penalty and formal Consent Decree with Smart City Holdings for blocking consumers’ personal


District court awards defendant its IPR-related fees under 285
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 1 2015

In Deep Sky Software, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co., Defendant Southwest Airlines ("Southwest") sought its fees and costs following the


FTC vs. Wyndham worldwide what it means for hotel owners
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2015

On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corporation. The case was highly anticipated


District court denies motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction where plaintiff sent ANDA Notice Letter
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2015

Defendants, Nang Kuang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ("Nang Kuang") and CANDA NX-2, LLC ("CANDA") (collectively, "Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss


District court grants summary judgment of no damages for failure to mark
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2015

Plaintiff Juno Manufacturing, LLC ("Plaintiff" or "Juno") filed a patent infringement complaint against Defendant Nora Lighting, Inc. ("Defendant" or


District court denies motion to exclude CEO from providing expert testimony on infringement
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 24 2015

Defendant filed a motion to strike plaintiff's expert report on infringement, asserting that the report failed to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 because


Enovsys v. AT&T: court excludes plaintiff's damage expert for failure to apportion and sua sponte bifurcates trial into liability and damage phases to be tried to different juries
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2015

After the court struck plaintiff's damage expert's report for failing to tie damages to the limited feature of the patented invention, the court


Motion for judgment on the pleadings based on unpatentability under Section 101 denied where patents were not directed to an abstract idea
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 17 2015

Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc


Class action defense cases Williams v. Superior Court: California Appellate Court affirms trial court order limiting discovery re putative class members to store location where Plaintiff worked
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 14 2015

The decision of the California Court of Appeal in Williams v. Superior Court (Marshalls), No. B259967 (Cal. Ct. App. May 15, 2015) will have