We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,120

Chestnut v. Apple: District Court Puts Plaintiff to the Test--Proceed on Limited Number of Claims or Continue Stay pending Inter Partes Review
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2016

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff asserted claims from two different patents against Apple. Apple filed an Inter Partes Review


EB-5 financing accelerates in 2016 and favors (1) Hotels, (2) Mixed-Use and (3) Multifamily as top 3 targets for EB-5 funding
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 8 2016

If you have been thinking about tapping into EB-5 financing for your development project, this is the time to make your decision and act quickly. If


District Court Grants Motion to Exclude Proceeding before PTAB during IPR But Allows Admissions and Arguments Made to PTAB to go before the Jury
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 8 2016

The plaintiff, Magna, filed a motion in limine to exclude references to Inter Partes Review ("IPR") proceedings. The defendant, TRW, filed a response


Defendants' Motion Seeking to Depose Opposing Counsel Denied Where Defendants Could Not Show That Information Was Unavailable from Another Source
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

After the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants for patent infringement, the defendants contended that they uncovered during discovery a series


District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss under Section 101 Even Though Two Other District Courts Had Founds Patents Ineligible
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 2 2016

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants filed motions for partial summary judgment of invalidity with respect to two of the patents at


Evidence of Copying Admissible in Patent Infringement Trial to Prove Nonobviousness
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Metaswitch moved to exclude evidence of copying from a patent infringement action filed against it by Genband. Genband asserted during the pretrial


Hotel Lawyer at the ALIS hotel conference in Los Angeles A turnaround in hotel investor sentiment? Was that just a raindrop or is the sky falling?
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2016

As our team of hotel lawyers returns from the Americas Lodging Investment Summit (or ALIS) in Los Angeles, we all noticed a big change. This is the


District Court Rules Plaintiff Need Not Come Forward with Evidence of Priority Date Earlier than Patent Application Until Defendant Produces Clear and Convincing Evidence of Invalidating Prior Art and Summary Chart Is Not Sufficient
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2016

Omega Patents, LLC ("Omega") filed a patent infringement action against CalAmp Corp. ("CalAmp") asserting that CalAmp infringes the claims of U.S


District Court Declines to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Where Claim Construction Briefing Had Already Occurred
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2016

After the PTAB granted Defendant's petition for IPR on certain of the claims in the patent-in-suit, the defendant filed a motion to stay the action


District Court Strikes Expert Opinion Testimony on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under Section 101
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2016

Defendants Metaswitch Networks Ltd and Metaswitch Networks Corp. ("Metaswitch") filed a motion to strike plaintiff's expert opinions of Mr. Lanning