We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 30

11th Circuit affirms dismissal of FCA claims against Lockheed Martin regarding allegedly defective coatings on F-22 stealth aircraft
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • June 7 2011

Former senior engineer at Lockheed Martin Corp., Darrol Olsen, filed a False Claims Act lawsuit against Lockheed, alleging that Lockheed used inferior and defective coatings on F22 aircraft


NJ appellate court holds that NJ False Claims Act cannot reach conduct occurring before March 2008
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • October 12 2011

The New Jersey Appellate Division for the Superior Court, Mercer County, recently held that the New Jersey False Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:32C1 to 15 and N.J.S.A. 2A:32C17 to 18, which was enacted on January 1, 2008 and made effective on March 13, 2008, does not apply retroactively to allegedly false claims submitted prior to the statute’s effective date


False Claims Act judgment against ConAgra reversed
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2010

Former employee, Ali Bahrani, filed a False Claims Act lawsuit against ConAgra, alleging that ConAgra altered thousands of meat and hide export certificates issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to avoid paying fees charged by the USDA for replacement certificates


U.S. Supreme Court upholds Affordable Care Act: significant aspects of Affordable Care Act for generic pharmaceutical companies
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2012

On June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148


Amgen seeks Supreme Court review of implied certification theory of liability under the False Claims Act
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • October 6 2011

The U.S. Courts of Appeals have been wrestling with the reach of the False Claims Act when the actual claim submitted to the government is not “factually false”


Defendant wins False Claims Act trial after the government kills $8.9m settlement agreement negotiated by relator; affirmed by fourth circuit
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2011

In United States ex rel. Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions, Case No. 09-2280, 2011 WL 1474783 (4th Cir. 2011), the Fourth Circuit affirmed a verdict for a defendant in a False Claims Act trial in a case where the Government declined to intervene and held the following: (1) the district court properly refused to enforce a settlement agreement; (2) the district court correctly admitted “government knowledge” evidence at trial; and (3) the district court erred in awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendant


E.D.N.Y. court allows government to contact Amgen employees outside the presence of Amgen's counsel
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2011

Amgen alleged that government lawyers violated Rule 4.2 of the New York Code of Professional Responsibility by communicating with present and former Amgen employees in connection with a grand jury proceeding and False Claims Act qui tam litigation


Court in Southern District of New York dismisses relator's False Claims Act complaint because no law or regulation prohibited hospital's billing method
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • April 13 2011

A former independent consultant to Beth Israel Medical Center ("BIMC"), Cleuza Colucci, brought a False Claims Act action against the hospital, alleging that it billed for and received inflated Medicare payments by purchasing Kings Highway and Doctors Hospital and then taking advantage of rate increases resulting from consolidation with BIMC for purposes of billing Medicare


Can a qui tam relator prosecute a False Claims Act case pro se?
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • April 19 2011

Qui tam relators cannot prosecute False Claims Act cases pro se after the United States declines to intervene, says the District Court in Nebraska in dismissing the relator's FCA claim


9th Circuit applies Iqbal's plausibility requirement to FCA case
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2011

Mary Cafasso, a former employee of General Dynamics C4 Systems (“GDC4”), brought a False Claims Act case against her former employer after her job was eliminated following corporate restructuring