We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 380

NLRB will ask Supreme Court to affirm board members
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2013

The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") announced today that it would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review a federal court ruling that


Trial court abuses its discretion by forcing insurer to bear the cost of giving notice to putative class members
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2013

In In re Insurance Installment Fee Cases, 2012 DJDAR 16696 (2012), the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District decided an


California Department of Insurance adopts amendments to auto repair regulations
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • January 8 2013

On December 31, 2012, the California Department of Insurance received approval for the adoption of amendments to regulations which govern written


District courts "must show their work" and provide detailed figures when deciding fee awards
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • February 12 2013

In Padgett v. Loventhal, U.S.C.A. 9th, DAR p. 1933 (Feb. 11, 2013), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided District Courts must explain how they


Five-day extension for mailing applies to deadline to file timely cost bill
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2013

In Nevis Homes LLC v. CW Roofing Inc., 2013 DJDAR 6187(2013) the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District decided a procedural


Cigna agrees to re-evaluate and to compensate disability insureds in the amount of $77 million
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2013

In a wide ranging re-evaluation of disability claims covering its insureds in California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, Cigna


Employers may not engage in coercive surveillance of unions
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2013

An employer risks violating federal labor laws by monitoring employees' union activities, or even creating an impression of surveillance. Whether an


Exotic dancers are employees, not independent contractors, Kansas Supreme Court rules
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2013

In Milano's v. Kansas Department of Labor, the Kansas Supreme Court determined that exotic dancers were employees, not independent contractors, for


Property owners are entitled to fee award arising from invalid claims made by homeowners association
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2013

In Grossman v. Park Fort Washington Association, 2013 DAR 747 (2013), the California Court of Appeal for the Fifth Appellate District decided an


Why employers need to keep adequate records
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • February 12 2013

Here is a pattern that tends to repeat itself often in employment litigation. A disgruntled employee sues an employer for discrimination, harassment