We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 437

Tech interests praise USPTO director nomination
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

According to a news source, technology industry interests have lauded President Barack Obama's (D) choice for U.S. Patent and Trademark Office


News bytes
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) makes available Guidance for Industry titled "Circumstances that Constitute Delaying, Denying, Limiting


New 'belief' defense to induced infringement: fixing what isn't broken?
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2013

Perhaps believing can make it so, at least according to the Federal Circuit's latest ruling regarding induced infringement and invalidity. In


Apportionment gets a whole lot of attention in landmark Virnetx, Inc. v. Apple Inc . (part I)
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 8 2015

The Federal Circuit delivered its clearest, most in-depth damages opinion in more than two years in VirnetX, Inc. v. Apple Inc. The court now (1


News Bytes - September 12, 2013
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 12 2013

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) schedules an America Invents Act (AIA) Second Anniversary Forum for September 16, 2013, in Alexandria


Using marking defense precludes pre-suit damages
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 3 2013

A license and a covenant-not-to-sue proved to be Plaintiff’s undoing when the U.S. Ethernet Innovations court decided sales by two large companies


‘Delayed’ marking defense erased
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 3 2013

The Grand Overseas court rejected a motion based on 287(a), holding that Plaintiff’s delay in marking and use of adhesive labels were not fatal to


RAND royalties revised - does Microsoft represent a "Georgia-Pacific" test for patent royalties (Part II)
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 19 2013

RAND royalties got a shot of adrenaline in the epic Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. opinion.1 Culminating years of litigation, Microsoft outlines a


News bytes
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2014

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeks input "on the design and conduct of the postmarketing requirements (PMRs) for the class-wide


Court rejects attempt to keep settled infringement suit alive through appeal
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 24 2013

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed as moot the appeal of a patent infringement dispute between parties that had settled the claims