We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 124

Award vacated because arbitrator applied the wrong rules.
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • May 31 2015

The Fifth Circuit vacated an arbitration award on grounds that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under the Federal Arbitration Act where the


Arbitration proceeding counts as “first-filed” action.
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • May 31 2015

Addressing an issue of first impression in Delaware, the Delaware Supreme Court concluded that there is no principled reason to distinguish an


Supreme Court: EEOC conciliation efforts subject to judicial review.
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • May 31 2015

Before suing an employer for employment discrimination under Title VII, the EEOC must first "endeavor to eliminate the alleged unlawful employment


仲裁権行使が遅れた場合仲裁条項の執行ができなく なる
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • May 13 2015

契約に規定された仲裁の権利を原告が適時に主張しな かった場合当該権利を放棄したことになるJoca- Roca Real Estate LLC v. Brennan, 772 F.3d 945 (1st Cir. 2014) (No. 14-1353


Procedural arbitrability is to be determined by arbitrators.
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

An employer's objection that an employee failed to deliver a formally compliant certificate of earnout dispute, and therefore did not satisfy a


Court erred in disqualifying arbitrator mid-arbitration.
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

Issuing a writ of mandamus, an appellate court directed the district court to vacate its order granting a party's motion to disqualify an arbitrator


Supreme Court to determine if arbitration provision referencing state law is preempted.
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiorari to address whether an arbitration clause that provides for application of state arbitration law was


Arbitration award reviewed under federal, not state, law.
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

An arbitration award was to be reviewed under the Federal Arbitration Act, rather than under a state arbitration act, where the parties' agreement


Arbitrators, not court, to determine preclusive effect of prior arbitration
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

The preclusive effect of a federal judgment that confirmed an arbitration award is to be determined by arbitrators in a subsequent arbitration, not by


Dodd-Frank Act claim may be arbitrated
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

A claim alleging whistleblower retaliation under the Dodd-Frank Act was held to be subject to an arbitration agreement, thwarting an employee's