We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 73

Supreme Court’s Environmental and Administrative Law Decisions in 2015-2016 Term
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2016

This Advisory briefly reports on some of the significant U.S. Supreme Court actions from January through June 2016 related to environmental and


Unclaimed accounts payable or payroll?
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2016

A very interesting unclaimed property memorandum opinion was recently issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in Temple-Inland


Arbitration Provisions Mauled by Consumer Watchdog
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2016

Companies offering payment services or financial products to consumers are facing a proposed rule from the CFPB that would prohibit class action


In NY, what is a “elevation-related hazard?”
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2016

Roughly two weeks before annual National Stand-Down Week (May 2-6), New York's Appellate Division, Second Department, in Vitale v. Astoria Energy II


The Robocalls and Class Actions Continue as FCC’s Omnibus TCPA Ruling Fails to Slow Surge of Lawsuits
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2016

In the face of ongoing uncertainty regarding permissible uses of modern telephone equipment under the TCPA, lawsuits and important precedents continue


Court Leaves Window OpenJust a CrackFor Class Certification
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2016

A Wisconsin District Court, in Mary Haley, et al. V. Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Co. Inc., No. 14-cv-99-BBC, recently denied a motion to certify a


Rejection of FERC’s geographic proximity test may mean more competition for private builders
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • November 23 2015

Developers subject to the Federal Power Act (FPA) should carefully consider the implications of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of


CalOSHA’s IIPP standard covers outdoor and indoor heat hazards
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • November 9 2015

Contractors employing workers that perform work outside have long known the importance of addressing outdoor heat hazards in their Injury and Illness


Judicial admission renders licensure uncontroverted
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • November 3 2015

Recently, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District, in Womack v. Lovell, et al., Case No. G409587 (June 5, 2015), reversed a


Cal. Supreme Court denies cert in Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. v. Bernards Bros. Inc.
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2015

In late August 2015, the California Supreme Court denied Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc.'s (Pacific Caisson) petition for review of the Second