We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,623

Les employeurs au Québec peuvent désormais contester les relevés d'imputation de la CSST
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 30 2015

Le 20 avril 2015, la Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (la CSST) a adopté une nouvelle politique sur le droit à l’assistance


Quebec employers can now challenge the CSST statements of imputed costs
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 30 2015

On April 20, 2015, Quebec’s worker’s compensation board, the Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (the CSST) adopted a new


Modernizing Ontario's business law: expert panel releases its "wish list"
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 28 2015

On February 15, 2015, Ontario's Minister of Government and Consumer Services asked a 13-member panel of legal practitioners and academics to survey


OSC publishes Policy Reformulation Table of Concordance and List of New Instruments
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 27 2015

The Ontario Securities Commission recently revised OSC Staff Notice 11-739 Policy Reformulation Table of Concordance and List of New Instruments. The


Loss of stock options: abusive or oppressive?
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 27 2015

The appeal of stock option plans (SOP) is undeniable. Indeed, by linking employees' personal gains to the growth of the company's share value, a SOP


Fees and expenses prospectus disclosure featured in most recent OSC Investment Funds Practitioner
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 27 2015

The Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) published the most recent edition of The Investment Funds Practitioner on July 23, 2015. This edition of The


Perte d'options d'achat d'actions : abus ou oppression?
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 27 2015

L’attrait des régimes d’options d’achat d’actions (ROAA) est indéniable : en liant les gains des cadres à l’augmentation du cours


Can in-house counsel be summoned by the AMF to testify in an investigation?
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 24 2015

The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal with respect to the 2014 Quebec Court of Appeal decision requiring in-house counsel to attend an


Quebec’s Bill 55 (an Act respecting transparency measures in the mining, oil and gas industries): wasteful duplication?
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 23 2015

On June 1, 2015, Canada proclaimed into force the Extractive Sector Transparency Act (Federal Act). The Federal Act requires mining, oil and gas


Mining issuers’ continuous disclosure discussed in CSA Continuous Disclosure Review Report
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 20 2015

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently published CSA Staff Notice 51-344 Continuous Disclosure Review Program Activities for the fiscal