We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 32

Proposals for the regulation of shadow banking postscript
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • May 24 2013

Short term investors are extremely risk-adverse. They demand two things at minimum - ready access to and the safety of their principal. When risk


Recent developments in the Regulation of Shadow Banking
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • November 15 2013

Over the summer and fall shadow banking regulation moved forward on several fronts. First, the SEC proposed rules that would reform the way money


Risk retention redux: the international context
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • May 7 2012

In comparison to the ongoing regulatory onslaught in Europe and the United States, we in Canada appear to have gotten off pretty lightly and may even have felt that this was completely justifiable given our country’s performance and the high performance standards maintained by Canadian assets throughout the financial crisis


The Bulk Sales Act and securitization transactions
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • June 20 2012

Rarely do judicial decisions arising under bulk sales legislation garner much attention


Regulatory overkill, American style
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • November 18 2011

Emerging from the vast literature generated by the recent financial crisis are two competing narratives attempting to identify the root cause of the crisis


Overview of comments on SEC's re-proposal of shelf eligibility conditions
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • November 2 2011

As reported earlier, on July 26, 2011 the SEC issued for comment a proposing release entitled “Re-Proposal of Shelf Eligibility for Asset-Backed Securities and Other Additional Requests” (the Re-Proposal


Overview of comments on CSA's prospectus disclosure proposals
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • October 18 2011

For the most part the CSA’s proposed prospectus disclosure rules escaped substantive comment although we and a few others did provide some technical comments


Final Dodd-Frank ABS rules:representations and warranties and review of assets
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 10 2011

As described in a number of previous posts, in October, the SEC published two proposals for rules mandated by the Dodd Frank Act: (i) those related to representations and warranties in ABS securities offerings; and (ii) those requiring any issuer of registered ABS to perform a review of the assets underlying the ABS


CSA proposed securitized products rules - parties, part I
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 12 2011

Proposed Form 41-103F specifies the supplementary prospectus disclosure requirements for distributions of securitized products


CSA proposed securitized products rules - parties, Part II
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 18 2011

As indicated in a previous piece, Item 1 of the proposed CSA rules deals with the various parties to a transaction and requires clear identification of each role that they play and the specific functions and responsibilities being performed in connection with each role