We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 32

Recent developments in the Regulation of Shadow Banking
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • November 15 2013

Over the summer and fall shadow banking regulation moved forward on several fronts. First, the SEC proposed rules that would reform the way money


SEC proposals on ABS: expansion of potential liability
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • October 7 2010

In our previous piece on the proposed Waterfall Computer Program requirement, we touched upon the unprecedented extension of securities law liability to the functionality of the computer program


CSA proposed securitized products rules - parties, part I
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 12 2011

Proposed Form 41-103F specifies the supplementary prospectus disclosure requirements for distributions of securitized products


CSA proposed securitized products rules - significant counterparties
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 25 2011

Under the proposed securitized product rules disclosure is also required in respect of certain significant counterparties in a transaction


SEC proposals on ABS: an overview
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • December 9 2010

While we wait for the other shoe to drop, perhaps it would be worthwhile to review the general state of play and try to better understand what it may mean for the securitization industry


Final Dodd-Frank ABS rules:representations and warranties and review of assets
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 10 2011

As described in a number of previous posts, in October, the SEC published two proposals for rules mandated by the Dodd Frank Act: (i) those related to representations and warranties in ABS securities offerings; and (ii) those requiring any issuer of registered ABS to perform a review of the assets underlying the ABS


SEC and CSA restrictions on the exempt market for securitized products
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • May 16 2011

As reported earlier, the SEC has included in Reg AB II proposals relating to the private market


CSA proposed securitized products rules - definition of securitized products
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 8 2011

As indicated in our previous posting, the Canadian Securities Administrators have proposed a new framework for the regulation of securitized products which includes: enhanced disclosure requirements for securities issued under a prospectus


CSA proposed securitized products rules - parties, Part II
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 18 2011

As indicated in a previous piece, Item 1 of the proposed CSA rules deals with the various parties to a transaction and requires clear identification of each role that they play and the specific functions and responsibilities being performed in connection with each role


Regulatory overkill, American style
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • November 18 2011

Emerging from the vast literature generated by the recent financial crisis are two competing narratives attempting to identify the root cause of the crisis