We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 577

2017 IPO Study
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 12 2017

Welcome to this fourth edition of Proskauer’s IPO Study. In it you will find our analysis


The Affordable Care Act and its coverage mandates for employers: a potent recipe for ERISA class actions
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 20 2012

Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has engendered much controversy (pro and con) in the business community, one area that has received less discussion is whether ACA may increase employers’ exposure to high-stakes class action litigation


Employment Status - Secretary of State for Justice v Windle and Arada
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • August 2 2016

In Secretary of State for Justice v Windle and Arada the Court of Appeal held that: supplying services on an assignment-by-assignment basis, rather


Third Circuit holds that the ADA can obligate an employer to reasonably accommodate an employee’s disability-related difficulties in getting to work
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2010

In a recent ADA case, Colwell v. Rite Aid Corporation, No. 08-4675, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7249 (3d Cir. Apr. 8, 2010), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed summary judgment for the employer and held that employers may need to make reasonable shift changes, allowing an employee with a visual impairment to work the day shift only in order to accommodate the employee’s disability-related difficulties in getting to work


No Scrubs Permitted: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Blog Post Is Not Advertising Actionable Under Lanham Act
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2017

In an interesting recent opinion, the Eleventh Circuit held that a doctor’s blog post criticizing another doctor and his clinical practice could not


Tomorrow is another one-a-day: FDA guidelines preempt vitamin claims, but consumer class still has opportunity to supplement
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

Although consumer class actions in California are dime-a-dozen, a recent Northern District of California case involving One A Day vitamins stands out


Ninth Circuit: Medical Providers Lack ERISA Standing
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2017

The Ninth Circuit affirmed two district court decisions that concluded medical providers were not “beneficiaries” under Section 502(a) of ERISA and


2016 IPO STUDY
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 8 2016

Welcome to this third edition of Proskauer’s IPO Study. In it, you’ll find our analysis of market practices and trends for U.S.-listed initial public


Another Post-Tackett Ruling Denying Retiree Health Benefits
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2016

A district court in West Virginia recently held that retirees were not entitled to lifetime health benefits under the clear and unambiguous language


Health care reform litigation risks the intersection of ERISA Section 510 and the Affordable Care Act’s whistleblower provisions
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2013

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is significantly changing employer health care obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA