We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 11

“A Major Leap Forward for Australian Insolvency Laws”
  • Bracewell LLP
  • Australia
  • February 26 2016

Australia is making several significant reforms to its insolvency legislation - with more changes likely to come - to provide much-needed comfort for


Sunset for the Sons of Gwalia? Proposed legislation to subordinate shareholder claims
  • Bracewell LLP
  • Australia
  • May 14 2010

We have been sending Client Updates since 2007 concerning the decision of the Australian High (Supreme) Court in Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic


Australian indemnitees from the perspective of US noteholders
  • Bracewell LLP
  • Australia, USA
  • June 3 2015

In representing US noteholders and other creditors in more than a dozen Australian workouts and insolvencies over the past 20 years, our consistent


For whom the bell decision tolls
  • Bracewell LLP
  • Australia
  • August 20 2012

Whether you are a John Donne, Ernest Hemingway or Metallica fan, the above clause rings a bell


Centro Properties Group reorganizes: one small step for man, one giant leap for Australian restructurings
  • Bracewell LLP
  • Australia
  • December 14 2011

After four long years, Australia-based Centro Properties Group (“CNP”) has consummated a global restructuring that combines a debt-for-equity swap with an aggregation of its assets into a new real estate investment trust, Centro Retail Australia (“CRF”


The Sons of Gwalia are dead!
  • Bracewell LLP
  • Australia
  • December 1 2010

Our clients must be sick to death about hearing us comment on the Australian Sons of Gwalia saga (which we have been doing for more than three years) but finally there is good news to report


Second Circuit clarifies elements of a domestic securities transaction under Morrison v. National Australia Bank
  • Bracewell LLP
  • Australia, USA
  • March 29 2012

On March 1, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that a foreign plaintiff may assert a fraud claim under the federal securities laws based on its purchases of securities issued by U.S. companies that are not listed on a U.S. securities exchange only when irrevocable liability to purchase or sell the securities was incurred or title to the securities transferred in the United States



Evan D. Flaschen
  • Bracewell LLP

John R. Brantley
  • Bracewell LLP