We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 103

Validating the voidable: a guide to the new procedures to ratify defective corporate acts under Delaware law
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • September 9 2013

On June 30, 2013, the governor of the State of Delaware signed legislation that amends the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL"). Among the


Koch rattles wine auction world: GBL 350 "game changer"
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • December 28 2012

To successfully assert a claim under New York General Business Law 349 (h) or 350, "a plaintiff must allege that a defendant has engaged in


OSHA to target auto supply manufacturers
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • March 17 2014

OSHA recently launched a Regional Emphasis Program (REP) that will focus enforcement resources on employers operating in the automotive supply


Scope of Uniform Trade Secrets Act trimmed by Arizona Supreme Court
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • December 1 2014

A recent Opinion issued by the Arizona Supreme Court highlights a noteworthy dichotomy in the way various states interpret the pre-emptive effect of


Congress considers companion bills that could have far reaching consequences for companies facing trade secret theft andor computer fraud and abuse
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • July 8 2013

A California legislator recently introduced two bills in Congress which, if passed, could have profound effects for companies seeking to pursue


Chicago federal court holds that a contractual limitation on a corporation's ability to compete should not be analyzed like an employeremployee non-compete
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • February 4 2014

A federal judge in Chicago recently held that when a corporation enters into a contract with another corporation under which it agrees not to engage


Customer lists and pricing information not trade secrets under Missouri law
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • July 7 2014

Judge Ross of the United States District for the Eastern District of Missouri recently declined to issue a preliminary injunction in a trade secret


Keeping clear of ADA accessible route claims the Ninth Circuit discusses what constitutes temporary obstructions
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • March 13 2015

On March 5, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 2015 WL 925586


Seventh Circuit holds that maintaining a trade secrets suit in bad faith can subject the plaintiff to an award of attorneys' fees
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • September 24 2013

The Uniform Trade Secrets Act, which has been adopted in some form in every state except New York, Massachusetts, and North Carolina, provides that


Violation of a non-compete agreement which was fundamental to a purchase and sale transaction nixes the deal
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • January 7 2013

On December 21, 2012, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, in Ellis v. Candia Trailers & Snow Equipment, Inc., found that a non-compete agreement was a