We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 952

NLRB reiterates its position that undocumented workers are entitled to “conditional reinstatement” in unfair labor practice cases
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

As reported in Epstein Becker Green’s May 2015 Immigration Alert, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board” or “NLRB”) continues to focus on


Private employers likely to face gender identity discrimination claims as federal government continues to expand Title VII protections to transgender employees
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

Since we last reported on the 2012 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") decision in Macy v. Holder, the federal government has


Motor carrier exemption applies to drivers who can be expected to drive interstate
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

In Resch v. Krapf’s Coaches, Inc., the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that drivers who “rarely or never crossed state lines” were nevertheless


Accepting social responsibility not legal liability
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 15 2015

We recently blogged about recent gender discrimination lawsuits filed against technology industry employers. Following in the wake of these lawsuits


Eleventh Circuit rules that state whistleblower law is preempted by National Bank Act
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 14 2015

On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (pdf) that the National Bank Act (“NBA”), 12 U.S.C. 24


Supreme Court’s decision in Mach Mining impacts employers’ approach to conciliation with the EEOC
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 5 2015

In a case that has implications for every employer and respondent on each charge in which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") finds


California Supreme Court takes up decision from Court of Appeal holding that on-call rest periods are permissible
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

On April 29, 2015, the California Supreme Court granted the employee’s petition for review of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Augustus v. ABM


Wisconsin Supreme Court holds that continued employment is sufficient consideration for a non-compete signed by a current at-will employee, provided that the employee is not fired shortly after signing
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Over the past 24 months, one of the hottest issues in non-compete law has been whether continued at-will employment, by itself, is sufficient


Massachusetts court defers non-compete case to arbitration even though competitor is not a signatory to former employee’s employment agreement
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

In a recent case in Massachusetts, a Superior Court Judge denied a former employer’s motion for a restraining order in a case alleging a violation of


Bill regarding non-compete agreements introduced in New York legislature
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • April 28 2015

A bill has been introduced in the New York State Legislature, aiming to clarify the laws of non-compete and non-solicit agreements in New York