We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 76

Court won’t reconsider prior ruling in NCAA class action
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 15 2014

On May 12, 2014, the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) lost its motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of a prior


Judge refuses to suspend previous Apple, Inc. ruling; considers limiting e-book negotiations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 12 2013

On Friday, August 9, 2013, Judge Denise Cote of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Apple's request to suspend


False advertising injunction upheld; it’s all good and good for you
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2011

In a case involving nutritional claims associated with baby formula, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld a $13.5 million jury verdict won by a generic baby formula producer and permanent injunction for false advertising against its longtime legal foe, brand name baby formula producer Mead Johnson


The CFI reduces fines imposed on the Nintendo group
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • May 8 2009

Between 1995 and 1996, the European Commission launched two separate investigations into the distribution of Nintendo’s video game cartridges and consoles


Lanham Act attorneys’ fees awarded in the absence of damages
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 31 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that even in the absence of an award of damages on a Lanham Act false advertising claim, a party can recover attorneys’ fees after obtaining an injunction that confers substantial benefit to the public


A recall notice directed to “6 Hour” energy shots could constitute false advertising
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2012

Addressing the issue of whether a recall notice issued by a competitor constituted false advertising and anti-competitive conduct in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed a district court’s judgment dismissing false advertising claims and affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Sherman Act claims


NCAA argues for dismissal of athletes’ latest antitrust complaint
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 24 2013

Last week, the NCAA asked the Northern District of California to throw out a suit initiated in 2009 on behalf of former and current NCAA athletes


NCAA appeals ruling on compensation for student-athletes
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

On November 14, 2014, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) submitted its initial brief to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals


FTC employs SAFE WEB Act to assist Canada’s Competition Bureau
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 8 2014

On July 30, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland denied Aegis Mobile LLC's motion to quash a Federal Trade Commission (FTC


Commission doubts Spain’s new broadband regulation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, Spain
  • November 21 2008

Following criticism from the European Commission over a lack of competition on certain wholesale broadband markets (IP071968), Spain's Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones (CMT) developed rules that would regulate broadband access