We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 81

Inv. no. 337-TA-773 terminated as to respondent 3M Company
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 18 2011

On November 17, 2011, ALJ Gildea issued an initial determination granting a joint motion filed by complainant Ogma, LLC and respondent 3M Company to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same, as to 3M based on a settlement agreement


RITEK moves for termination in 788 investigation based on consent order
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 23 2011

Respondents RITEK Corporation and Advanced Media, Inc.RITEK USA filed a motion for termination based upon a consent order stipulation and proposed consent order in Investigation No. 337-TA-788, Certain Universal Serial Bus Portable Storage Devices, Including USB Flash Drives and Components Thereof (“788 Investigation"


Procedural schedule issued in Inv. no. 337-TA-799
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 22 2011

On September 22, Acting Chief ALJ Bullock issued an order setting the procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-799, Certain Computer Forensic Devices and Products Containing the Same, based on the parties' joint revised procedural schedule


Inv. No. 337-TA-776 terminated as to respondent Pass & Seymour based on consent order
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 14 2011

ALJ Essex issued an initial determination granting respondent Pass & Seymour, Inc.’s motion to terminate Investigation No. 337-TA-776, Certain Lighting Control Devices Including Dimmer Switches and Parts Thereof (IV), based on consent order


Procedural schedule modified in Inv. No. 337-TA-773
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 9 2011

On August 8, 2011, ALJ Gildea issued an order setting the procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same


Commission institutes new investigation concerning Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software and assigns ALJ Gildea
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 9 2011

On August 8, 2011, the Commission instituted Inv


Inv. No. 337-ta-773 terminated as to Sony Ericsson respondents
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 5 2011

ALJ Gildea granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Ogma, LLC and Respondents Sony Ericsson Mobil Communications (USA) Inc. and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB (collectively “Sony Ericsson”) to terminate Investigation No. 337-TA-773, Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices and Components and Products Containing Same, as to Sony Ericsson


ALJ Bullock issues initial determination terminating the investigation as to drugstore.com
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March, 9, 2012, Chief ALJ Bullock issued an initial determination granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent drugstore.com based on a consent order stipulation in Inv. No. 337-823, Certain Kinesiotherapy Devices and Components Thereof


ALJ Essex orders respondents to respond to discovery requests in 337-TA-804
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March 9, 2012, ALJ Essex granted complainants Litepanels, Inc.’s and Litepanels, Ltd.’s (“Litepanels”) motion to compel discovery and ordered respondents Fuzhou F&V Photographic Equipment Co., Ltd (“F&V”) and Shantou Nanguang Photographic Co. Ltd. (“Nanguang “) to provide full and complete responses various interrogatories and requests for production


Federal Circuit upholds Commission's $11 million penalty on Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. for violating exclusion and cease and desist orders
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 16 2012

On February 8, 2012 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in the decision Ninestar Technology Co. v. International Trade Commission, affirmed the Commission's imposition of a penalty of over $11 million on Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. (Ninestar) and two of its U.S. subsidiaries for their continued importation and sales of refurbished ink cartridges subject to exclusion and cease and desist orders