We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,051

What is a “reasonable” request for information under section 279 of the WCRA?
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 29 2016

The Queensland Court of Appeal has upheld a narrow view in relation to the scope of information required to be provided under section 279(1) of the


Can a Worker seek Damages for "Rejected" Injuries?
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 24 2016

The Industrial Court of Queensland finds that Workers are not entitled to a "second bite of the cherry". On 24 November 2016, in Connor v Queensland


Drink Driving vs Unsafe Overtaking - a decider of liability
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 22 2016

The case of Smith v Randall illustrates that in cases where there are multiple factors contributing to a motor vehicle accident, the court will


Another Warning on Estate Litigation Costs
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 17 2016

A common misconception about estate litigation is that the estate will meet all the costs. “Have a go because the costs will be paid by the estate”


QCAT update: Unit owners left high but not dry
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 15 2016

In Body Corporate for HQ Apartments CTS 39869 v Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) 2015 QCAT 115, the Queensland Civil and


BCIPA update: natural justice bites again!
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 15 2016

The Supreme Court of Queensland has just handed down its decision in the matter of Ostwald Bros Pty Ltd v Jaylon Pacific Pty Ltd & Ors 2016 QSC 240


Is a body corporate acting reasonably?
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 11 2016

In Ainsworth v Albrecht 2016 HCA 40, the High Court of Australia has unanimously allowed an appeal from the Queensland Court of Appeal. This is one


A - Z of Property Part 3
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 4 2016

A guarantee is a legally binding commitment by someone (the guarantor) to honour the obligations, of a third party (the principal party), pursuant to


Apple Photo Ring Scandal: has Apple breached customer privacy?
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 2 2016

Four male staff have been fired from an Apple store in Carindale, Queensland after it was discovered that they were stealing and then sharing personal


Whether to grant or deny an extension of time?
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • November 2 2016

In Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC the High Court heard an appeal brought from a decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South