We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 46

Involved In Multiple Businesses? You Might Be a Joint Employer!
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • February 1 2016

In our previous post about the DOL's new Administrator's Interpretation ("AI") on joint employment under the FLSA, we focused on "vertical" joint


New FLSA Exemption Rules - Coming In July?
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • February 1 2016

Over the last few months we've been asked on an almost daily basis when the DOL will be publishing its hotly anticipated white collar exemption rules


Supreme Court to Reexamine Service Advisor Exemption
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • January 18 2016

Last October, we reported on a petition by an auto dealership asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals


Serial Accommodation Lawsuits Against Restaurants
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • January 7 2016

Earlier this year, we reported on a spike in the number of ADA public accommodation lawsuits being filed against businesses in Illinois. (FR Alert:


DIRECTV v. Imburgia
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • December 28 2015

Last week, in DirecTV v. Imburgia, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision once again re-affirming the strong federal policy in favor of


City Not Liable For Chicago Police Officers' Blackberry Work Time
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • December 21 2015

If a tree falls in the forest but there is no one around to hear, does it make a sound? If a non-exempt worker answers an e-mail message after hours


Many home companionship workers no longer exempt
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • September 23 2015

Agencies and other third-party employers of live-in household employees and home companionship providers, take note: the long-delayed regulations


11th Circuit "tweaks" test for whether interns are employees
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • September 21 2015

If you are a regular reader of this blog, you are probably familiar with the six-factor test that the U.S. Department of Labor uses to determine


High Court: applicant need not specifically request religious accommodation to maintain Title VII claim
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • June 1 2015

On June 1, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an applicant rejected for a retail store position by Abercrombie & Fitch because she wore a


“Super” anti-harassment policy may create unanticipated liability
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • December 10 2014

Ordinarily, employers think of anti-harassment policies as a means of defending themselves against harassment claims rather than a source of