We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 171

U.S. Supreme Court issues decisions that favor employers
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2013

On June 24, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued two decisions that provide additional protections to employers defending claims made under


Can you inadvertently cancel a non-competition agreement?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2013

Non-competition agreements can be integral to the successful operation of a business. When an employee leaves the business, non-competition agreements


The Ohio Supreme Court provides additional guidance regarding employment services and the exclusion for employees that are permanently assigned to a consumer
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 1 2012

The Ohio Supreme Court recently issued a decision upholding a sales tax assessment against a company that purchased employment services


Sixth Circuit allows RIF lawsuit to proceed
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • September 25 2007

When a company implements a “reduction in force,” or “RIF,” it is possible that one or more of the employees whose jobs are eliminated may not agree with the company’s decision


Cleveland charter requires equipment operators get prevailing wage
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2007

After five different lawsuits spanning nine years, Cleveland’s construction equipment operators and master mechanics finally got an answer earlier this month: unless a collective bargaining agreement had set their paywhich it had notthe City Charter required that they receive prevailing wages, and for nearly 11 years they had not done so


Who can challenge failure to pay prevailing wage?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2007

Most Ohio contractors are, or should be, aware of prevailing wage requirements on public construction projects (with the exception of school construction, where prevailing wage is not required


What the courts are saying...
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2008

Our case summaries for the month of April begin with an opinion from the Court of Appeals for Medina County


Court denies motion to produce photos stored on mobile phone: orders preservation and allows inspection by single defense attorney
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 29 2007

In this sexual orientation discrimination case, defendant moved to compel the plaintiff, a former waiter at the defendant café, to produce photos stored on his cell phone


Contractual arbitration provisionscan they be enforced by and against third parties?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2007

Arbitration is now a favored form of dispute resolution


Leaving multiemployer pension plan may require arbitration
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2007

Because construction workers tend to change jobs frequently, many contractors contribute to multiemployer pension plans connected with specific collective bargaining agreements