We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 171

Could this be you? Employees injured while on the road
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • October 24 2014

The Supreme Court recently issued a ruling favorable to employers whose employees travel for work. The employee, a visiting nurse, provides in-home


Death of the newsie
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • October 9 2014

In California, a state judge recently ruled that the newspaper carriers for the Sacramento Bee and the Fresno Bee have been mischaracterized as


A new defense for tortious interference
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 17 2015

A recent decision by the Minnesota Supreme Court may lead to groundbreaking changes for the claim of tortious interference of contract. The case


Supreme Court interprets employer’s pregnancy discrimination obligations
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2015

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important opinion in a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit against UPS. After UPS driver Peggy Young became


Does posting a LinkedIn status violate a non-solicitation agreement?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 12 2014

A Connecticut company brought suit against a former employee alleging violations of a non-compete agreement and the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets


U.S. Supreme Court issues ruling on NLRB recess appointments
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2014

On June 26, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling invalidating three recess appointments made by President Obama in 2012 to the National


Sixth Circuit affirms denial of class certification in Davis v. Cintas Corp.
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 10 2013

On May 30, 2013, a unanimous panel for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision affirming the denial of class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) in Davis v


Supreme Court issues two pro-employer decisions
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2013

The Supreme Court issued two pro-employer decisions. In the first, the Supreme Court ruled that a supervisor must have authority to take a tangible


Ninth Circuit finds employee statutory claims cannot be removed under CAFA
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 21 2014

The Ninth Circuit ruled that a would-be class action for alleged violations of the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) by an employer


$420 million settlement deadline approaching for eligible Ohio employers
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2014

With the deadline a week away, only a small fraction of eligible Ohio employers have filed claims to receive their share of a $420 million state