We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 4,046

Plaintiff reaches agreement with Skinnygirl in Margarita false advertising suit
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

Skinnygirl Cocktails, LLC and a consumer have filed a joint stipulation of dismissal in a lawsuit alleging that the company and its reality-TV-star


“Handmade” claim “obviously cannot be used literally to describe bourbon,” court finds
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

A Florida federal court has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Beam Suntory Inc. and Maker’s Mark Distillery falsely label their Maker’s Mark bourbon


Trans fat putative class actions filed against General Mills, Nestle
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

A California man has filed purported class actions against Nestle USA Inc. and General Mills Inc. claiming that both companies use trans fat in their


Scientific debate heats up over safety of grease-resistant chemicals
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

More than 200 scientists have signed a statement published in Environmental Health Perspectives that calls for limits on the use of certain water-


Consumer Group alleges lead content in T.J. Maxx balsamic vinegar violates Prop. 65
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against T.J. Maxx, its parent company and its food supplier alleging that they failed to provide a


Proposed changes to California’s Prop. 65 could expand warning label requirements
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

After two years of debate, the California Environmental Protection Agency's (CalEPA's) Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assess- ment may soon


Red Bull false advertising settlement approved
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

A New York federal court has reportedly approved an agreement between Red Bull GmbH and a class of consumers, settling allegations that Red Bull


Monster Energy faces lawsuit over potentially lethal ingredient ECGC
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 9 2012

A putative class action filed in a California state court claims that Monster Rehab, a green tea and energy drink, contains unknown amounts of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (ECGC), “an extremely dangerous and potentially lethal ingredient,” and that the company fails to warn consumers of its potential hepatotoxic side effects


“Nitrite in combination with amines or amides” under consideration for Prop. 65 listing
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

The California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has asked the Carcinogen Identification


Industry groups appeal injunction denial in Vermont GMO-labeling case
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

The food industry groups challenging Vermont's statute requiring the labeling of food containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have filed a