We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 259

Ramipril section 8 appeal dismissed from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2015

On Monday, April 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada heard the appeal of 2014 FCA 68, relating to the issue of damages under section 8 of the


Pfizer’s blue diamond shaped pill not found to be distinctive
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 29 2015

Pfizer’s application for the Viagra Tablet Design has been found to not be distinctive under s. 38(2)(d) of the Trade-marks Act, and therefore not


Formulation patent found not to be infringed as a redacted excipient was not a “pentahydric or hexahydric alcohol”
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2015

Apotex has successfully alleged that Teva’s patent to “Stable Compositions Containing Rasagiline” will not be infringed by Apotex’s use of a


Court of Appeal upholds decision relating to sildenafil use patent
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 27 2014

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v. Apotex Inc., 2014 FCA 13 Drug: VIAGRA sildenafil In Apotex' action for impeachment of the Pfizer patent


With quantum of damages settled, parties unable to agree on quantum of costs or calculation of pre- and post-judgment interest in Section 8 case
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 14 2014

In the Federal Court’s earlier decision (summary here), the parties were instructed to attempt to reach an agreement on the quantity of damages and


Motion for reply evidence granted in part
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 1 2015

This is an appeal from the decision of a Prothonotary, denying leave to file reply evidence in a proceeding pursuant to the Patented Medicines


Allegations of obviousness of three patents found justified
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 18 2015

In a proceeding pursuant to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, the Court was asked to consider three patents. Apotex alleged


Ontario Court of Appeal conclusively dismisses generic’s unjust enrichment arguments in section 8 case
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 18 2015

Apotex has brought a case against Lilly pursuant to s. 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the NOC Regulations). As part


Court of Appeal strikes paragraphs relating to issue estoppel and abuse of process from statement of defence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 21 2011

The Court of Appeal heard an appeal from the Motions Judge where the majority of impugned paragraphs in the Statement of Defence were allowed to stand


Formulation patent allegations of non-infringement, obviousness and lack of utility justified
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 2 2015

Servier sought a prohibition order against Apotex in relation to its DIAMICRON MR gliclazide product. The application was dismissed. The patent at