We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 19,694

Taj Mahal Palace Hotel Trademarked
  • RNA IP Attorneys
  • India
  • June 23 2017

The Indian Trade Marks Registry recently granted trademark registration for image of the iconic 114-years-old building of 'Taj Mahal Palace' hotel in


Two Genericness Cases: BAGCORP and PATINA - Can You Guess What Goods?
  • Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC
  • USA
  • June 23 2017

In two recent genericness cases, the Board affirmed a refusal to register BAGCORP and sustained a petition for Cancellation of a registration for


The KitKat case: To protect or not to protect: The fine lines
  • AA Thornton & Co
  • United Kingdom
  • June 23 2017

In the recent judgement in the case of Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA vs Cadbury UK Ltd 2017 EWCA Civ 358, handed down a few weeks ago by the


Government of Canada releases long-awaited proposed amendments to the Trademarks Regulations and Industrial Design Regulations
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • Canada, Global
  • June 23 2017

On June 19, 2017, the Canadian Government released proposed amendments to the Trademarks Regulations and Industrial Design Regulations. The proposed


Give me a break
  • Lewis Silkin
  • United Kingdom
  • June 23 2017

Last month the Court of Appeal gave us the latest decision in the long running battle between Nestle and Cadbury. Interestingly, whilst agreeing that


Servicing trade mark infringement
  • Lewis Silkin
  • United Kingdom
  • June 22 2017

The use of a third party trademark to provide information or describe a service being offered does not necessarily constitute trademark infringement


Captain Morgan Defeats Admiral Nelson in a Rum Branding Battle
  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • Canada
  • June 22 2017

The victory in the fight between two rum competitors demonstrates that unregistered trade dress rights are alive and well in Canada, admissible


SCOTUS Declares Lanham Act’s Prohibition Against Registering Disparaging Trademarks Unconstitutional
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Matal v. Tam, affirming the Federal Circuit and holding that the Lanham Act’s


Intellectual Property Newsletter - June 2017
  • Shearman & Sterling LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

The patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. 1400(b), provides that patent infringement actions "may be brought in the judicial district where the


Your New ight to Disparage - a Look Inside “The Slants” Lanham Act Decision
  • McCarter & English LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

The Federal trademark statute’s more-than-60-year prohibition on registering trademarks that may be viewed as disparaging goes out the window with