We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 37,353

Evidence for establishing sound prediction and the use of trial and error experimentation to establish an enabling disclosure
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • March 30 2017

The Federal Court of Appeal’s (FCA) recent decision in Teva v. Leo Pharma addresses important issues related to the doctrines of sound prediction


European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee’s hearing on the unitary patent
  • Bristows LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 30 2017

In its meeting on 2223 March 2017, the European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee held a hearing on ‘The Unitary Patent: state of play’ (recording


Evidence for establishing sound prediction and the use of trial and error experimentation to establish an enabling disclosure
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • March 30 2017

The Federal Court of Appeal’s (FCA) recent decision in Teva v. Leo Pharma addresses important issues related to the doctrines of sound prediction


Brexit process triggered - how will it affect IP in UK and Europe?
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 30 2017

The UK government has officially informed the European Union (EU) that it intends to leave the EU triggering a negotiation process which should be


IP Snapshot - March 2017
  • CMS
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 29 2017

In response to a reference from the Dutch courts, Advocate General Spzunar (the “AG”) has provided an opinion on whether a P2P file sharing search


European IP Snapshot - March 2017 欧洲知产快讯 - 2017年三月
  • CMS
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 29 2017

Bringing you regular news of key developments in European intellectual property law. 持续为您提供欧洲知识产权法律的关键更新


Janssen v. Celltrion, Damages: “Patent Dance” May Determine Availability of Lost Profits
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • March 29 2017

On March 2, 2017, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued an order in Janssen v. Celltrion explaining that an


Supreme Court rules that laches is not a defence for patent damages
  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • USA
  • March 29 2017

The Supreme Court recently held that the doctrine of laches cannot bar a claim for damages in patent infringement cases. The decision reverses a


Supreme Court confirms audit report qualified basis to claim royalty
  • Formosa Transnational
  • USA
  • March 29 2017

The Supreme Court recently affirmed the IP Court’s judgment at appellate level, allowing a patent owner and licensor to claim for underpaid


$30m for infringement of Bayer’s Australian Yasmin patent - a “small” jurisdiction with big benefits
  • Shelston IP Pty Ltd
  • Australia
  • March 29 2017

Bayer initially sued Generic Health for infringement of its Australian patent, AU780330, by the manufacture and sale of the competing product