We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 9,629

IPRs Are Not Time Barred by an Earlier ITC Complaint
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • March 28 2017

Since their introduction as part of the America Invents Act, Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) have proven to be a powerful tool for parties accused on


ITC Proceedings Do Not Trigger One Year Clock to File IPR
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • March 28 2017

Increasing use of Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) by patent stakeholders and an increase in the number of ITC complaints heighten the importance of an


CAFC issues detailed opinion on apportionment and lost profits; apportionment not required when Panduit test is met
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • March 24 2017

The Federal Circuit, in Mentor Graphics Corp. v. Eve-USA, Inc. (also including Synopsys, Inc. as a defendant), Nos. 2015-1470, 2015-1554, 2015-1556


The Federal Circuit Finds Broad Claims to Be Patent Eligible because the Claims Are “Nearly Indistinguishable” from Those in Diamond v. Diehr
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2017

Nearly 40 years ago, the Supreme Court held in Diamond v. Diehr that while patent claims directed solely to abstract ideas, such as mathematical


Federal Circuit Opinion Astrazeneca v. Apotex Cites Patent Damages Treatise
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • March 24 2017

The Federal Circuit once again cited Patent Damages Law and Practice as a leading commentary. The comprehensive treatise was coauthored by Chris


The Future of “Single Use Restrictions” in Jeopardy
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2017

In 1992, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that manufacturers of patented medical devices can use the patent laws to


Supreme Court Rejects Laches Defense in Patent Cases
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week that laches is not a defense in the majority of patent cases. Justice Alito, writing for the 7-1 majority


Section 101: Protecting Software & Other Technologies
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 23 2017

Section 101 of the patent statute provides a fundamental threshold for the types of inventions that can be patented. In this episode, McDermott IP


Supreme Court Tosses Laches Defense To Patent Damages
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • March 22 2017

The Supreme Court has reversed the Federal Circuit’s en banc decision in SCA Hygiene Prods. V. First Quality Baby Prods., 807 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir


Supreme Court Holds Laches Is Not a Defense to Patent Infringement Damages
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2017

On March 21, 2017, in SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, the Supreme Court overturned long-standing Federal Circuit law