We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 10,319

SCOTUS to Decide 2: Are AIA Patent Reviews Constitutional?
  • Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

For the second time in less than a month, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 12, 2017 granted certiorari in a case involving inter partes review. In Oil


In re: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC, Nos. 2016-1092 and 2016-1172 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Evidence of commercial success must have a nexus to the claimed invention


Rivera v. ITC, No. 2016-1841 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Claims must find support in the specification, despite that they may be obvious in light of that specification


The Medicines Co. v. Mylan, Inc., Nos. 2015-1113, 2015-1151, and 2015-1181 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Federal Circuit interprets the term “batches” in patent claims to require a specific process of “efficient mixing” from specification


SCOTUS Declares Lanham Act’s Prohibition Against Registering Disparaging Trademarks Unconstitutional
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Matal v. Tam, affirming the Federal Circuit and holding that the Lanham Act’s


Nichia Corporation v. Everlight Americas, Inc., Nos. 2016-1585 and 2016-1618 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 28, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Courts not required to grant injunction upon finding of infringement unless patentee proves all four equitable factors The patentee sued the alleged


Rembrandt Wireless v. Samsung Electronics, No. 2016-1729 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Licensee's failure to mark may limit a patent owner's recovery of pre-suit damages even for a disclaimed patent claim The patent owner sued alleging


Your New ight to Disparage - a Look Inside “The Slants” Lanham Act Decision
  • McCarter & English LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

The Federal trademark statute’s more-than-60-year prohibition on registering trademarks that may be viewed as disparaging goes out the window with


ArcelorMittal v. AK Steel Corporation, No. 2016-1357 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

District court retained subject matter jurisdiction for motion for summary judgment because the patentee's statements and "tacit acceptance" of


Asetek Danmark AS v. CMI USA Inc., Nos. 2016-1026, 2016-1183 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

A non-party must be sufficiently “legally identified” with the an enjoined party to be enjoined for conduct other than abetting a new violation