We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 6,010

PTAB Trial Estoppel Demystified in EDTX?
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

IPR estoppel is established under 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(2), which provides that “the petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent


EDTX Interprets Federal Circuit Precedent Narrowly, Recommends Applying 315 Estoppel Broadly
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

In Biscotti Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Magistrate Judge Payne recommended that estoppel under 315(e) apply broadly against Microsoft in an


Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Pursue Claim that Was Discovered After Bankruptcy Filing
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

Recently, we discussed a decision from the U.S. District Court for the District Columbia that considered whether a former employee’s failure to


Supreme Court to Decide Whether PTAB May InstituteDecide AIA Trials on Fewer than All Challenged Claims
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

The Supreme Court issued an order on May 22, 2017, granting SAS Institute’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Federal Circuit’s


Supreme Court Lets Flores Ruling Stand, Requiring Some Employers to Include Cash In Lieu of Benefits in Calculating Overtime Pay
  • Atkinson Andelson Loya Ruud & Romo
  • USA
  • May 19 2017

On May 15, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the City of San Gabriel’s ("City") petition for review of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision


Ninth Circuit Grants Petition to Hear FTC v. AT&T Appeal En Banc
  • Buckley Sandler LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2017

On May 9, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted a petition for rehearing en banc filed by the FTC in a case involving whether the


Is the One Year Time Bar for Filing an IPR Subject to Appellate Review?
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2017

On May 4, 2017, the en banc Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., Appeal 2015-1944 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2016) to


Court Finds “Plausible” DOJ’s Assertion That Anti-Steering Provisions Violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 18 2017

Recently, Judge Robert T. Conrad, Jr. of the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina (Charlotte Division), rejected


It’s the Cover-Up That Gets You
  • Crowell & Moring LLP
  • USA
  • May 17 2017

On May 16, 2017, the Fourth Circuit issued a decision in United States ex rel. Omar Badr v. Triple Canopy, holding that the Government had properly


Due Process: Just How Much Process is Due?
  • Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC
  • USA
  • May 16 2017

IPR proceedings are formal administrative adjudications subject to the procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). One such