We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 18,344

Supreme Court decision on key indirect discrimination cases
  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 21 2017

In the conjoined cases of Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice 2017 UKSC 27, the Supreme

New York City Council Passes Bill Banning Inquiry Into Salary History in Hiring
  • Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
  • USA
  • April 20 2017

Amendment to the NYC Human Rights Law Makes It an Unlawful Discriminatory Practice for Employers to Ask Applicants to Disclose Salary History, but

Another Appeals Panel In NYC Declines To Hold That Title VII Covers Sexual Orientation
  • FisherBroyles LLP
  • USA
  • April 20 2017

Just two weeks after the federal appeals court in New York City held that Title VII does not cover sexual orientation discrimination claims, another

Employment Update: Duplication of Claims - An Important Decision for Employers
  • Mason Hayes & Curran
  • Ireland
  • April 20 2017

Employers face increased risk of duplication of claims by employees before both the Workplace Relations Commission and the Irish High Court on foot

Legal update - Three Bills in train
  • Buddle Findlay
  • New Zealand
  • April 19 2017

There are currently three employment-related Bills progressing through Parliament, one of them quite controversial. If passed, it would allow some

Burr Alert: Does Title VII Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation: the Eleventh Circuit Says No, While the Seventh Circuit Says Yes
  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2017

Since its inception, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) has prohibited employers from discriminating against employees and

Is Hiring the Most-Qualified Candidate Reasonable? Two Recent Decisions Say Yes.
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2017

For several years now, employers and the EEOC have been at odds over whether employers must automatically reassign a disabled

Seventh Circuit Holds That Sexual Orientation Is Protected Under Title VII
  • Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
  • USA
  • April 17 2017

With its recent en banc decision in Hively v. Indy Tech. Cmty. Coll. Of Ind., 2017 WL 110393 (7th Cir. 2017), the Seventh Circuit became the first

Trade Group Complains that PJM’s Frequency Regulation System Unduly Discriminates Against Energy Storage Resources
  • K&L Gates
  • USA
  • April 17 2017

The Energy Storage Association (ESA) filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) alleging that PJM

Seventh Circuit hands down landmark ruling on sexual orientation discrimination
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • April 17 2017

On April 5, 2017, in a landmark decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting en banc, held that Title VII of the Civil Rights