We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 13,395

Federal Circuit Reverses Fee Award in Case Tagged as Exceptional
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • June 19 2017

While the Supreme Court’s decisions in Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc


Christian Louboutin’s fight against counterfeits of their lipsticks in China
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China
  • June 16 2017

The specific measures established in this case provide a guiding standard to determine essential factors of irreparable damage to a patented design


Federal Court Strikes Patent Infringement Action Where Plaintiff Could Not Articulate How Its Rights Were Infringed
  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • June 16 2017

A patent owner cannot sue in the hopes that the necessary facts to support infringement will emerge during discovery. From the outset, a plaintiff


Supreme Court to Decide If USPTO's Inter Partes Review Violates Constitution
  • Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2017

The constitutionality of AIA patent inter partes review (IPR) proceedings will be examined by the Supreme Court. On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court


Supreme Court Interprets BPCIA Provisions Relating to the ‘Patent Dance’
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2017

On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted two provisions of the Biologics Price Competition & Innovation Act (BPCIA) relating to patent


Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of AIA Patent Reviews
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2017

On Monday, June 12, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the AIA patent review system will be eliminated on constitutional grounds. If


Will the Supreme Court Kill IPRs?
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2017

This week, the Supreme Court granted Oil States Energy Service, LLC’s Petition for Cert, challenging the constitutionality of the IPRs. The primary


PTAB Invalidates Two Cisco Patents Found Valid and Infringed at the ITC
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • June 14 2017

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued Final Written Decisions regarding Cisco’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,377,577 (the “’577 Patent”) and 7,023


Planned Motion to Dismiss Insufficient to Extend Rule 26(f) Deadlines
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2017

In an ongoing patent infringement case involving patents for floor-mounted electrical outlet housings, a federal court in Connecticut recently denied


Sandoz v. Amgen Supreme Court Decision
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2017

On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., Nos. 15-1039, 15-1195,1 interpreting two provisions