We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 13,071

China to Coordinate the Linkage between Patent and Drug Registration
  • AFD China Intellectual Property Law Office
  • China
  • May 24 2017

The Food and Drug Administration of China (CFDA) recently published the draft of Regulations on Promoting Innovation of Drug and Medical Devices and


Review of SPC Judicial Interpretation regarding Trial of Patent Disputes and Infringement
  • AFD China Intellectual Property Law Office
  • China
  • May 24 2017

We have recently reviewed the judicial interpretations of Supreme People's Court regarding patent dispute and infringement. To explain the relevant


3 patent cases of the Top 10 IP Cases Decided by Chinese Courts in 2016 released by the Supreme Court
  • Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd
  • China
  • May 24 2017

The Supreme Court holds that in accordance with Paragraph 4, Article 26 of Patent Law, the technical solution that the Cliams seeks to protect shall


Supreme Court released the Top 10 Cases and the Summary of judgment points for patent disputes of the 50 typical cases
  • Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd
  • China
  • May 24 2017

Prior to the 17th World IP Protection Day, the Supreme Court released the Top 10 IP Cases Decided by Chinese Courts in 2016 and the Summary of


Deposition Testimony Regarding Strategy Resulted in Broad Subject Matter Waiver.
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

In Sprint Communications. Co., L.P. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, No. 11-2684-JWL (D. Kan. Feb. 23, 2017), a patent infringement matter, the


High Court: Laches Not a Defense to Patent Claim Within Limitations Period.
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

In SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (U.S. Mar. 21, 2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that laches


CAFC Finds ANDA Infringement Despite Differences Between FDA Labeling And Claim Language
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

In a non-precedential decision issued in Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district


Does Apple Pay infringe any patents?
  • Gardere
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

The New York Times reported that Universal Secure Registry’s filed a lawsuit against Apple and Visa alleging that “Apple Pay digital payment


Supreme Court’s TC Heartland Decision Will Move Venue Out of E.D. Texas
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

On May 22, 2017, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned nearly thirty years of Federal Circuit


U.S. Supreme Court Limits Venue Under the Patent Statute in TC Heartland
  • Paul Hastings LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

On May 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, put an end to the swirling legal debate