We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,431

Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, No. 2015-1919 (Feb. 15, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2017

While sending letters into a forum is not enough for personal jurisdiction to be "fair and reasonable," if a party "does more," then jurisdiction may

Court rules on damages for design patent infringement
  • Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu PC
  • USA
  • March 14 2017

The ongoing design patent infringement action between Apple, Inc. ("Apple") and Samsung Electronics, Co. ("Samsung"), over smartphone designs took

Federal Court Preliminarily Enjoins California Law that Prohibits Reporting Actors’ Ages
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • March 9 2017

California Assembly Bill 1687 ("AB 1687"), which went into effect on January 1, 2017, requires certain entertainment websites to remove a paid

Ninth Circuit Dodd-Frank Protects Internal Whistleblowers
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 9 2017

On March 8, 2017, a split three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Northern District of California decision declining to

Can Water Win a Lawsuit?
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • March 8 2017

Two plaintiffs recently filed a complaint in federal court in the Northern District of California against the Craft Brew Alliance (“Craft Brew”

LendingClub Update: Class Plaintiffs Claim Defendants Are “Arguing Facts” on a Motion to Dismiss
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • March 8 2017

We have been keeping up with the In re LendingClub Securities Litigation class action, No. 3:16-cv-02627-WHA in the Northern District of California

Northern District Of California Dismisses Some, But Not All, Securities Fraud Claims Based On Accounting Disclosures
  • Shearman & Sterling LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2017

On February 24, 2017, Judge Edward Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted in part and denied in part

Northern District of California Finds Claims Directed to Device Pairing Patent Eligible
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • March 6 2017

Is a patent directed to electronic communications between computing devices patent eligible? As with many legal questions, the answer to this question

Waymo v. Otto: Self-Driving and Self-Dealing
  • Crowell & Moring LLP
  • USA
  • March 3 2017

Last week, Waymo LLC (a subsidiary of Google’s parent company Alphabet, Inc.) filed suit in the Northern District of California against Uber

The CAFC Vacated the Northern District of California’s Claim Construction Because the District Court Improperly Limited the Claims Based on Prosecution History Disclaimer
  • Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • March 3 2017

A district court may only limit claims based on prosecution disclaimer to the extent that the patentee makes clear and unmistakable disclaimers. If a