We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,813

Supreme Court to Consider Fundamental Issues in Omissions-Based Fraud Cases
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2017

The Supreme Court recently agreed to review a case which has split the circuit courts and has potentially huge implications for disclosure liabilities


Disclosing Election of a New Director: Remember Item 5.02(d) of Form 8-K When Doing a Merger
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2017

All competent securities lawyers know that Item 5.02(d) of Form 8K requires a filing, on Form 8K, whenever a public company elects a new director


D.C. Circuit Strikes Down FCC Opt-Out Notice Requirement for “Solicited” Fax Ads
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 20 2017

The D.C. Circuit recently dismantled a claim commonly asserted under the TCPA’s Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005, by rejecting the FCC’s rule that fax


Trademarks in the USA
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • Global, USA
  • April 19 2017

A structured guide to trademark laws in the USA


SEC Issues Guidance to Robo-Advisers
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 19 2017

Robo-advisers are a fast-growing segment of the investment advisory industry. In fact, they now account for an estimated $71.5 billion in assets under


CFPB Issues Proposed Amendments to Clarify Mortgage Data Rule
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2017

On April 13, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued proposed amendments to Regulation C (the implementing regulation for the Home


AEIOU and Sometimes IDIQ - Indefinite DeliveryIndefinite Quantity Contract Use Remains Proportional.
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 17 2017

As we previously discussed both on this blog and elsewhere, observational and indirect evidence told us that the use of Indefinite DeliveryIndefinite


5 Top Takeaways: When Is an Opinion of Counsel Required in the New, Post-Halo Environment?
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 17 2017

Kilpatrick Townsend Partner James Isbester recently addressed the Intellectual Property Section of the Contra Costa County Bar Association at a CLE


Spokeo Dismissals - With Prejudice, Without Prejudice or Something Else?
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2017

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), federal courts and litigants have grappled not only


4 Key Takeaways: All the Crime We Cannot See
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2017

Kilpatrick Townsend Partner Audra Dial recently served as moderator on a prestigious panel at the American Bar Association’s 32nd Annual Intellectual