We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,318

Minnesota Patent Litigation Wrap-Up - June 2017
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • July 14 2017

This post continues our monthly summary of patent litigation in the District of Minnesota, including short summaries of substantive orders issued in


Pfizer Takes Aim at Herceptin Patent at the PTAB
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • July 12 2017

Pfizer has shown its muscle in the biosimilars field, purchasing Hospira in 2015 and launching the second biosimilar on the U.S. market, Inflectra


Judge Gilstrap Provides Guide for Post-TC Heartland Venue Analysis
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • July 12 2017

In the aftermath of TC Heartland, Judge Rodney Gilstrap is taking the position that venue should be simple. As he explains his position in Raytheon Co


U.S. Trademark Office Clarifies Filing Deadlines for Resurrecting Dead Applications and Registrations
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • July 5 2017

It has long been possible to resurrect trademark applications and registrations that were inadvertently allowed to lapse. Effective July 8, any


Pleading Willfulness - One Year Post-Halo
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 28 2017

Just over a year ago, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 1923 (2016). Halo


Herbert Kunz Interviewed by Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, "What You Need to Know about Patents in Europe"
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • June 28 2017

Principal Herbert Kunz was interviewed by Metropolitan Corporate Counsel in the article "What You Need to Know about Patents in Europe." MCC: Tell us


Exhaustion and the “Right to Repair”: Ownership Rights after Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Intern., Inc.
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Hailed by some as the “right to repair”, on May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that a seller’s patent rights are not valid beyond the first sale of


Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Disparaging Trademarks
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 21 2017

The Supreme Court on Monday in Matal v. Tam unanimously struck down part of a 70-year old federal trademark law, holding that it violates the Free


Distillations: Redemption Song, or, Number One with a Bulleit
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 21 2017

A trademark can be more than just a word, of course. The Lanham Act's definition of a trademark "includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any


Kyle Bass Ends with a Bang: Success in Final PTAB Decision
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 20 2017

On June 7, 2017, Kyle Bass received his last Final Written Decision in a long list of PTAB decisions rendered over the past two years as Kyle Bass