We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 381

Than “Function-Way-Result” Test For Evaluating Equivalence In Chemical Patent Cases
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

In a May 19, 2017 panel decision, Federal Circuit Justices Lourie, Moore and Reyna suggested that an "insubstantial differences" test may be more


Federal Circuit clarifies application of post-America Invents Act on-sale bar
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

On May 1 2017 a Federal Circuit panel in Helsinn Healthcare SA v Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc held four pharmaceutical patents invalid under the


Supreme Court Limits Venue In Patent Cases To Districts Where The Defendant Resides Or Has A Regular And Established Place Of Business
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

On May 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC issued a decision limiting venue in patent cases


Federal Circuit Clarifies Application Of Post-AIA On-Sale BarIn Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • May 2 2017

On May 1, 2017, a Federal Circuit panel in Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2016-1284, 2016-1787, held four


Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • April 27 2017

On April 26, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. on two questions regarding the Biologics Price Competition and


Trademark procedures and strategies: United States
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • March 29 2017

US Trademark Law is governed by a federal statute known as the Lanham Act, as well as state law. The Lanham Act governs enforcement of trademarks


Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Grp. LLC
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • March 28 2017

On March 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Group LLC. This case concerns


Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Determining Whether Designs On Useful Articles Are Eligible For Copyright Protection: Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc.
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • March 23 2017

While federal copyright laws unquestionably allow protection for original works of art, copyright eligibility has been less clear in situations where


Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Impression Products Inc. v. Lexmark Int’l, Inc.
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • March 22 2017

On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Impression Prods., Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. This case concerns


SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products: Supreme Court holds that laches cannot preclude a claim for damages incurred within the Patent Act’s six-year limitations period
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • March 22 2017

In a 7-1 decision issued yesterday, the Supreme Court held that the equitable defense of laches (i.e., delay in filing suit for patent infringement