We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 50

Sixth Circuit holds U.S. EPA can question pre-construction emission projections

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2013

On March 28, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that U.S.EPA has the authority to challenge pre-construction emissions

Insurer must defend claims based on insured’s use of non-pollutant floor sealer

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

A federal court in Missouri has determined that a floor-sealing product used by a construction cleanup company was not a "pollutant" and that the

The issues 2013: upcoming legal topics in the Czech Republic

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • Czech Republic
  • -
  • February 1 2013

The adoption of the new Civil Code and the Act on Corporations, effective as of 1 January 2014, is a step of great importance for the Czech law. There

On the horizon for 2013

  • Dentons
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 17 2013

Our experts select the highlights likely to impact businesses in the UK generally, so you can check quickly

Preview 2013 (UK law)

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 15 2013

2013 will herald some significant changes to the UK legal arena, notably in the corporate area in relation to executive remuneration and narrative

Resurgent mold litigation in Sandy's wake

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2012

There is a significant risk that there will be a resurgence of mold claims and mold litigation in the wake of Hurricane Sandy

New York’s high court requires city construction authority to amend eis

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

The New York Court of Appeals has ruled that the New York City School Construction Authority (NYCSCA) has violated the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) by failing to include information on long-term maintenance and monitoring in an environmental impact statement (EIS) for a project partially located on a Brownfield site

Building demolition is it waste?

  • Hunt & Hunt
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • November 2 2012

In this case the defendant company and its director were charged with offences for unlawful transport of waste under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1999 ('POEO Act') sections 143(1)(a) and 169 respectively

Can you really go to jail for violating a stormwater permit?

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

A recent criminal enforcement case confirms that the answer to this question is “yes.”

EPA’s authority to remove opt-out provision from lead-based paint renovation rule upheld

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 13 2012

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) authority to remove a lead-based-paint renovation rule provision that allowed contractors to opt out of certain protections against lead exposure