We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

FIDIC Subcontract 2011: A critique of the alternative dispute resolution procedures

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Japan
  • -
  • November 30 2012

In September's Construction dispute avoidance newsletter we considered the long-awaited FIDIC Conditions of Subcontract for Construction of Building and Engineering Works designed by the Employer First Edition 2011 (the "2011 Subcontract"

ADR in construction disputes: arbitration and dispute boards are not the only answer

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Japan
  • -
  • December 17 2012

Disputes between parties to a construction project are relatively commonplace. Many can be resolved without great difficulty, but this is not always

The enforceability of dispute board decisions

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • April 26 2013

Many standard form international contracts specifically, the FIDIC suite of contracts, NEC3 and ICE Contracts each contemplate the resolution of

Dispute boards

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Japan
  • -
  • July 27 2009

Many parties to major construction and engineering contracts look for a means of obtaining interim binding decisions on disputes, so that work can progress pending final resolution by arbitration or litigation

Soundbites

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, Vietnam
  • -
  • January 31 2011

On 1 January 2011 the Law on Commercial Arbitration ("LCA") came into force in Vietnam

AJU v AJT 2011 SGCA 41

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • October 31 2011

The Singapore Court of Appeal has reaffirmed that the public policy ground for challenging an arbitral award will be interpreted very narrowly by the Singapore courts, overturning a previous High Court decision