We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 5,151

Enforcing DAB decisions: the Perusahaan saga continues

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • October 31 2014

The case of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia) 2014 SGHC146 is the latest court ruling in what has become a

Risk allocation in major construction projects - the use of indemnities

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 31 2014

How does the standard EPC approach compare to 'knock for knock', and what matters should be borne in mind when drawing up indemnities? We consider

TCC procedural update: ADR and cost budgeting

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 31 2014

The TCC has recently decided two points of procedure which will be of interest to those involved in or considering proceedings in the court. The

High Court clarifies builders’ duty of care to developers and owners for economic loss

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 30 2014

Earlier this month, the High Court of Australia delivered its judgement, unanimously overturning the NSW Court of Appeal, in Brookfield Multiplex Ltd

Texas Supreme Court limits the enforceability of no-delay-damages provisions

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 30 2014

The Texas Supreme Court held that a no-delay-damages provision cannot shield an owner from liability for deliberately and wrongfully interfering with

Good news for builders and construction contractors!

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 29 2014

The High Court of Australia has this month held that no duty of care is owed by a builder to avoid a subsequent purchaser’s pure economic loss

Regional Steel: the continuing effort to avoid the cost of correcting the insured’s work

  • DLA Piper LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

Casualty insurers normally do not expect to pay the cost of their insureds simply doing a good job. Insurers typically view their contracts as

Settlements with furniture removal service providers

  • DLA Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
  • -
  • South Africa
  • -
  • October 29 2014

Cover pricing is a practice in terms of which a firm, in response to an invitation to tender, submits a fictitious, higher bid by agreement with its

Just say "no" to others using your contractor's license number

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

In a recent press release, California Contractors State License Board Registrar Steve Sands reminds contractors that "contractor licenses are not

A brief legal guidance: where BIM is implemented on a project

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 28 2014

BIM is increasingly being used in the Australian construction and infrastructure industry. As more and more projects adopt BIM to manage design and