We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-1 of 1

ECJ rules on parental liability and the Commission's duty to consider serious arguments put forward by the parent company aimed at rebutting liability

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • October 14 2011

The European Court of Justice's (ECJ) ruling in Elf Aquitaine (Case C-52109) of 29 September 2011 confirms that parent companies are able to rebut the presumption of their liability for anti-competitive behaviour by their subsidiaries and that the Commission needs to provide adequate reasons where it decides that the facts or legal arguments relied on by the parent company are not sufficient to rebut the presumption