We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 149

Empowered protection of industrial property in the Russian Federation

  • Cugia Cuomo & Associati Studio Legale
  • -
  • Russia
  • -
  • April 3 2013

In 2006, the Russian Federation has started a reform process aiming at the adoption of protective measures of industrial property, implementing in

What matters: A review of 2011 and 2012

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

As you know, the last two years have seen a somewhat improved, but by no means robust, business climate. At the same time, structural shifts in the

Abuse of IP rights under China's antitrust rules: recent cases have a potentially serious impact

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • March 22 2013

Corporations doing business in China, based on their intellectual property (IP) rights, need to be aware of the potentially serious impact of China's

How much "competition", if any, is required to establish standing in Lanham Act false advertising casesthe Supreme Court may be interested in resolving the three-way circuit split

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2013

Lanham Act false advertising law is largely consistent among the various Federal Circuit courts. However, one area of Lanham Act jurisprudence where

U.S. cracks down on IT theft by overseas manufacturers

  • Tilleke & Gibbins
  • -
  • Thailand, USA
  • -
  • February 8 2013

Marking an unprecedented milestone in the fight against unfair competition, a state attorney-general in the United States has taken legal action

Google Inc v ACCC: More detailed analysis

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 6 2013

Further to our breaking news post this morning (we promised there was more to follow!), our Anthony McKew and John Swinson have prepared an alert on

2012 in review: key legal and regulatory developments

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • December 20 2012

This table provides an overview of the key developments in 2012 to date

George clooney, Julia Roberts file right-to-privacy and unfair competition action against Kennesaw-based projector seller and "John Does 1-20"

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2012

On October 12, 2012, Hollywood celebrities George Clooney and Julia Roberts filed suit in the Atlanta Division against Digital Projection, Inc. ("DPI"), a seller of projectors and related items based in Kennesaw, Georgia

Doing business and raising capital in Canada

  • Torys LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 29 2012

We have prepared this Business Law Guide as a general overview of certain legal and business matters that may be relevant to a decision to establish or invest in a business in Canada

Intellectual property rights and technology: the “smartphone” wars

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • April 25 2012

Across the globe, disputes have broken out between manufacturers of smartphones and tablet computers (such as Apple and Samsung) about “standards-essential patents”, and whether competition law limits their enforcement