We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 45

What matters: A review of 2011 and 2012

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

As you know, the last two years have seen a somewhat improved, but by no means robust, business climate. At the same time, structural shifts in the

Google Inc v ACCC: More detailed analysis

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 6 2013

Further to our breaking news post this morning (we promised there was more to follow!), our Anthony McKew and John Swinson have prepared an alert on

2012 in review: key legal and regulatory developments

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • December 20 2012

This table provides an overview of the key developments in 2012 to date

George clooney, Julia Roberts file right-to-privacy and unfair competition action against Kennesaw-based projector seller and "John Does 1-20"

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2012

On October 12, 2012, Hollywood celebrities George Clooney and Julia Roberts filed suit in the Atlanta Division against Digital Projection, Inc. ("DPI"), a seller of projectors and related items based in Kennesaw, Georgia

Spanish authorities impose sanctions on press clipping associations

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Spain
  • -
  • July 26 2011

On 10 May 2011, the Spanish National Competition Commission imposed several sanctions totalling an aggregate sum of 335,000 on associations of Spanish newspapers publishers and clipping companies for committing two prohibited practices under competition law

Opinion of the Advocate General threatens the revenues of sports rights holders

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 4 2011

The Advocate General delivered an Opinion yesterday in a test case on the ability of sports rights holders under EU law to limit the rights granted to satellite broadcasters to a given national territory

2010 year in review: key legal and regulatory developments

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • December 28 2010

In this last issue for the year 2010, the Allen & Gledhill Legal Bulletin provides an overview of the key developments in 2010

U.S. Supreme Court reverses Seventh Circuit decision refuses to treat NFL as a single business entity

  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 4 2010

In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court rejected the National Football League's ("NFL") argument that it should be accorded antitrust protection as a single business entity with respect to its licensing of intellectual property, rather than as the concerted action or conspiracy of 32 member teams

Supreme Court rejects NFL's "single entity" argument

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 4 2010

Last week, in American Needle, Inc. v. NFL, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the 32 NFL teams’ pooling of their intellectual property rights into a single company for the purposes of jointly licensing those rights constitutes concerted action under 1 of the Sherman Act

Supreme Court blocks NFL play for antitrust immunity

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2010

If there was any doubt before, there is none now

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy