We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

The FTC loses yet another “reverse payment” case

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2010

On February 22, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia dismissed an antitrust challenge brought by the FTC and private plaintiffs to a so-called “reverse payment” patent settlement relating to the drug Androgel

Patent settlement developments: California court dismisses challenge to patent settlement as legislation moves forward in Congress

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 23 2009

The courts, and now Congress, continue to grapple with how to analyze the antitrust implications of patent settlements with so-called "reverse payments" from a branded pharmaceutical manufacturer to a generic manufacturer

FTC implements new legal strategy in judicial challenge to patent settlement

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2009

On February 2 2009 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed its latest challenge to a patent litigation settlement involving a so-called 'reverse payment'

FTC implements new legal strategy in judicial challenge to patent settlement

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2009

On February 2, 2009, the FTC filed its latest challenge to a patent litigation settlement involving a so-called "reverse payment"