We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 306

FTC settlement bars patent troll from using deceptive tactics

  • Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 12 2014

On November 6th, the Federal Trade Commission announced it had settled its first consumer-protection lawsuit against MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC

FTC battles trolls

  • Venable LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

Yes, we're a tease. The Bureau Director and Commissioners do not have cameos in next month's final installment of the Hobbit (and no, this is not

Consent order settles FTC complaint against patent assertion entity

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2014

On Nov. 6, 2014, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it has brought an enforcement action against a patent assertion entity seeking to

Second Circuit rules that foreign anticompetitive use of royalty-free patent is insufficient to establish a domestic effect giving rise to claim under the FTAIA

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2014

Standards essential patents can run afoul of United States antitrust law when the patent owner acts in a matter which creates anticompetitive risks

Legal FAQ: Section 337 investigations before the International Trade Commission

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2014

The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) investigates claims of unfair competition under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended

Allegations that defendants provided product for “free” state claims under California’s UPA and UCL, notwithstanding that “cost” of product was recouped by overcharging for shipping

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 10 2014

Plaintiff Bebe Au Lait sells nursing covers. It was the first company to make and sell, pursuant to patent, a flexible, convex stiffener located

Will Namenda IR withdrawal force a legal switch on product hopping?

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 3 2014

On September 15, 2014, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed an anti-trust lawsuit against the specialty pharmaceutical company Forest

Sham-wow! antitrust liability may attach to sham administrative petitions

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing whether the “sham” exception to Noerr-Pennington immunity is limited to sham litigation in courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Second Circuit reverses a prior ruling to hold that the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act restrictions on antitrust claims based on foreign conduct are “nonjurisdictional”

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2014

This dispute concerned the development of the latest industry standard for USB connectors, known as USB 3.0. Plaintiff, a Taiwanese company

Fair play?

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 20 2014

With blockbuster drugs reaching the end of their patent lives, many companies are looking for new ways to best secure their formulations and protect