We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 4,723

Third Circuit to plaintiffs’ bar: expert testimony necessary for certification must satisfy Daubert

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2015

Plaintiff purchasers of traditional blood reagents, products that test the compatibility of donor blood with recipients, brought putative class

Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a U.S. law firm representing a foreign country is not necessarily immune from discovery, but a nongovernmental corporation may be

  • Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2015

In the case of Mare Shipping, Inc. v. Squire Sanders (US) LLP, 574 Fed.Appx. 6 (2014), the Second Circuit stated that a U.S. law firm representing

Four takeaways from the ABA antitrust Section’s 2015 Spring Meeting

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2015

This year's 63rd ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting featured extensive remarks from antitrust regulators forewarning of more vigorous

StubHub sues the Golden State Warriors and Ticketmaster over secondary ticket market

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2015

Technological advances make it easier than ever to purchase tickets for live sporting events via secondary ticket exchange. These advances create

FTC flushes McWane in a big Eleventh Circuit exclusive dealing win

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2015

The situations where exclusive dealing policies, explicit or tied to an aggressive discounting program, cross the line under the rule-of-reason

Eleventh Circuit affirms FTC finding that rebate program served to unlawfully maintain monopoly power

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2015

The Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed a Federal Trade Commission finding that a manufacturer’s rebate program requiring exclusivity from its

FTC seeks to secure first disgorgement in nearly a decade

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2015

The FTC announced yesterday that Cardinal Health, Inc. (“Cardinal”) has agreed to pay $26.8 million to resolve its investigation into the company’s

FTC settles radioactive allegations against Cardinal Health with a near record-breaking disgorgement agreement

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2015

In a 3-2 decision, as part of its aggressive antitrust enforcement in health care industries, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or the Commission

First e-commerce price fixing prosecution yields swift guilty plea

  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 20 2015

In what it is calling the Antitrust Division’s “first criminal prosecution against a conspiracy specifically targeting e-commerce,” the Department of

Broadcasters, cable operators debate FCC proposal on effective competition

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2015

Comments filed last Friday in response to the FCC's rulemaking proposal to alter the current standard for determining effective cable competition