We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 4,155

Sham-wow! antitrust liability may attach to sham administrative petitions

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing whether the “sham” exception to Noerr-Pennington immunity is limited to sham litigation in courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

General counsel update September 2014

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Russia, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Court's new rules come into force on 1 October 2014 and are to apply to any arbitration

Settlement negotiations resume with Apple & Google employees in no-poach suit while tech giants appeal rejection of $324.5 million settlement

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 26 2014

Last month we reported a California federal judge rejected Apple and Google's $324 million anti-poaching settlement deal for being too low. The tech

Competition is competition regardless of one's physical location

  • Greensfelder Hemker & Gale PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 26 2014

A recent Illinois Appellate Court decision found that one's physical location is irrelevant in determining whether one has violated a non-competition

Parties seek expedited answers on changes to college sports

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 26 2014

As we discussed in more detail in our previous article, the extent to which the O'Bannon decision, which found that the NCAA operates as a "cartel"

Second Circuit reverses a prior ruling to hold that the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act restrictions on antitrust claims based on foreign conduct are “nonjurisdictional”

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2014

This dispute concerned the development of the latest industry standard for USB connectors, known as USB 3.0. Plaintiff, a Taiwanese company

Third Circuit rejects presumption of irreparable harm in Lanham Act cases

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 23 2014

The Third Circuit ruled in Ferring Pharmaceuticals v. Watson Pharmaceuticals on August 26 that "a party seeking a preliminary injunction in a Lanham

Mergers 101 so you have a deal, now what?

  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 23 2014

This podcast offers a brief introduction into the world of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, more commonly referred to as the

NCAA’s limits on athletes’ compensation for use of their names or likenesses violates antitrust laws

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2014

The National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) fundamental beliefs about the role of student-athletes and its economic model just received a

FTC continues aggressive scrutiny of hospital mergers

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2014

A recent New York Times article highlighted new developments regarding the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) continued focus on hospital mergers