We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 50

Supreme Court declines to hear antitrust case leaving uncertainty regarding customer loyalty programs

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

On April 29, 2013, the Supreme Court declined to review a decision that had created uncertainty as to when a manufacturer's customer loyalty program

On issue of significant import to companies, Supreme Court to consider whether State Attorney General action properly removed to Federal Court

  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 29 2013

Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to address the question of: "Whether a state's parens patriae action is removable as a 'mass

Two manufacturers’ grants of exclusive dealerships to home depot held not enough to allege illegal agreement

  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2013

A federal district court in California this month dismissed claims by a smaller hardware store chain against Home Depot and two manufacturers of

U.S. merger notification and interlocking directorates thresholds announced for 2013

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2013

Yesterday the Federal Trade Commission announced the Hart-Scott-Rodino ("HSR") Act thresholds that will apply to transactions closing on or after

FTC announces revised thresholds for interlocking directorates

  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 15 2013

The Federal Trade Commission has announced revised thresholds for interlocking directorates required under Section 8 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C

Federal Trade Commission increases interlocking directorates thresholds

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 15 2013

On January 14, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission published its annual revision of the interlocking directorates thresholds under Section 8 of the

Mobile game rivals clash in California trade secret and unfair competition suit

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 15 2012

The litigation between Kixeye and Zynga, two rivals in the mobile gaming market, has heated up over the past week

Seventh Circuit dismisses unusual derivative action challenging interlocking directorate

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2012

On June 13, 2012, a Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Panel slapped down a derivative action against Sears Holding Corporation ("Sears") alleging a violation of Section 8 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits interlocking directorates

Credit interchange settlement: the impact on selected future transactions

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2012

Much has been and will be written about the Memorandum of Understanding, filed on July 13, 2012, that sets out the parties’ binding obligation to enter into a class settlement agreement in the long-pending interchange fee antitrust litigation (“MOU”

Covenant against competition in consultant agreement does not violate Sherman Act

  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 12 2012

Mary Kay sued a former national sales director (the next level up from a Mary Kay consultant) for enforcement of a contractual covenant against competition

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy