We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
A claim of misrepresentation in relation to the purchase of certain investment products should be allowed to proceed to trial for the full facts to be examined; further, the issue as to whether a non-reliance clause is effective should be fully considered at trial
On 14 September 2011, the Singapore Exchange ("SGX") announced amendments to its listing rules to strengthen corporate governance practices and foster greater corporate disclosure
On 2 June 2011, the Singapore Exchange ("SGX") issed a Consultation Paper on Proposed Rule Changes on General Meetings to Increase Shareholder Engagement and Enhance Corporate Governance Practice
The decision of the District Court on 3 March 2011 in the case against the former directors of Airocean Group Ltd ("Airocean"), a company listed on the Sigapore Exchange ("SGX"), especially the severity of the sentence meted out against Peter Mahdavan - an independent non-executive director of Airocean - was surprising to many
