We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Motion to dismiss claims against former officers and directors denied

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2007

The District Court sustained claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and deepening insolvency asserted by the successor-in-interest to the Committee of Unsecured Creditors of DVI, a defunct company, against DVI’s former officers and directors

The business litigator

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2009

After a relatively brief and checkered stint in Delaware courts, it appears that the cause of action against corporate directors for "deepening insolvency" may have lost its place in Delaware corporate jurisprudence

Creditors of insolvent limited liability companies cannot sue derivatively

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2011

The Supreme Court of Delaware recently held that creditors of insolvent Delaware limited liability companies (LLCs) lack standing to bring derivative suits on behalf of the LLCs

Directors of insolvent company did not breach fiduciary duties

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 14 2008

Plaintiff, the trustee of the Chapter 7 estate of Security Asset Capital Corporation (SACC), a corporate debtor, brought an action against the debtor’s officers and directors, alleging that they breached their fiduciary duties by failing to commence Chapter 7 liquidation once SACC became insolvent

Commingling of identities held insufficient to pierce corporate veil

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 20 2009

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania recently found that a bankruptcy trustee could not either pierce the corporate veil of a limited liability company to reach the owners of the LLC, nor could the trustee "reverse-pierce" the corporate veil of the owners of the LLC to reach a separate restaurant business that they owned