We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

California non-solicits and overly expansive confidentiality agreements invite employer liability

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2011

In 2008, the California Supreme Court decided Edwards v. Arthur Anderson LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008) ("Edwards"), which signaled the death knell for customer non-solicits in California

California Court of Appeal enforces stipulated injunction that restricts competition

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 10 2012

Although the California courts have steadily eroded employers’ ability to contractually limit their former employees’ solicitation of their customers, a stipulated injunction limiting solicitation can still be enforced

California Court of appeal underscores importance of proper identification of trade secrets in litigation

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 9 2009

The recent case of Perlan Therapeutics v. Superior Court (California Ct App 11042009) serves as a reminder that when litigating, the definition of the trade secrets at issue is important