We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Court rejects use of alter ego doctrine to “borrow” contractor license

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 15 2012

California’s Contractors’ State License Law, Business & Professions Code Section 7000 et seq., requires contractors to be licensed unless they are exempt from licensure

The case of the board member who didn’t show up or did she?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2012

Consider a board with a total of five authorized members but with only three members in office

Bill proposes expanded definition of “independent contractor”

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2012

Currently, the California Corporations Code does not define the term “independent contractor”

The Corporations Code can make suing your former employees costly

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 16 2012

Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter once told the following story about Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. and Ralph Waldo Emerson

Why Section 25100(o) certification still matters (Part 3); big whistleblower award by OSHA

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 15 2011

In two earlier posts, I wrote about why the Commissioner’s certification of a national securities exchange pursuant to Corporations Code 25100(o) still matters

Is a sole shareholder an employer?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 20 2011

A corporate employer controls its employees