Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-3 of 3
1 for 3 million reverse split fraud claim survives motion to dismiss
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 28 2012
Nancy Wojtas at Cooley LLP alerted me to an interesting ruling case decided last week by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Gardner v. Major Auto. Cos., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118191 (E.D. N.Y. Aug. 21, 2012
Court of Appeal decides buy-out questions under Re-RULPA
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 28 2011
California’s Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, commonly known as Re-RULPA, established a mechanism by which partners can avoid a judicial dissolution of the partnership by purchasing for cash the partnership interest owned by the partners initiating the judicial dissolution proceeding
Nevada Supreme Court addresses delivery of dissenters’ rights notices
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 13 2011
Last week, the Nevada Supreme Court answered the question of whether notice of dissenters’ rights must be delivered to both stockholders of record and beneficial owners
Current Search
- Workarea - Company & Commercial
- Workarea - Corporate Finance/M&A
- Workarea - Litigation
- Author - Keith P. Bishop