Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Paolino v. Mace Security International, Inc.
- Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 8 2009
Plaintiff Louis D. Paolino (“Paolino”) sought indemnification and advancement of fees and expenses incurred in defending against counterclaims asserted by the defendant, Mace Security International, Inc. (“Mace”), in an arbitration proceeding that Paolino initiated
SOC-SMG, Inc. v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5375-VCS (September 15, 2010)
- Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 20 2010
In this case, the Delaware Court of Chancery denied a motion for several forms of relief, including an orderdisqualifying the opposing party's counsel in arbitration and terminating all the opposing party's claims anddefenses in arbitration
Resolving business disputes without costly litigation: the Delaware Voluntary Alternative Dispute Resolution Act
- Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 14 2010
Undoubtedly, virtually every commercial enterprise is aware of the significant costs associated with resolving business disputes through litigation
Global Link Logistics, Inc. v. Olympus Growth Fund III
- Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 29 2010
In this Memorandum Opinion, the Court of Chancery dismissed cross-claims for contribution following an arbitration panel's finding that cross-claim plaintiffs and cross-claim defendants committed fraud and breached certain representations made in a stock purchase agreement
Current Search
- Workarea - Company & Commercial
- Workarea - Arbitration
- Firm Name - Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP